Epstein files

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
M M

mat

Guest
A woman has alleged that she was repeatedly forced to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew as part of a lawsuit that claims an American investment banker passed her around rich and powerful friends as a “sex slave” while she was still underage.

The accusation was made in a lawsuit brought by women who say they were exploited by Jeffrey Epstein, an American multi-millionaire who was convicted of soliciting sex with an underage girl in 2008, reports the Guardian.

The prince is not a named party in the legal claim, and has not had any opportunity to respond to the allegations. He has previously denied any sexual contact with young women associated with Epstein.

Buckingham Palace has declined to comment on the allegations, reports the Guardian. A spokesperson said the royal household would not comment on ongoing legal matters, the report said.


That can is opening....

P.S

Paging BM Legal department....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

mat said:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/news/prince-andrew-named-in-underage-sex-lawsuit-9954198.html

A woman has alleged that she was repeatedly forced to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew as part of a lawsuit that claims an American investment banker passed her around rich and powerful friends as a “sex slave” while she was still underage.

The accusation was made in a lawsuit brought by women who say they were exploited by Jeffrey Epstein, an American multi-millionaire who was convicted of soliciting sex with an underage girl in 2008, reports the Guardian.

The prince is not a named party in the legal claim, and has not had any opportunity to respond to the allegations. He has previously denied any sexual contact with young women associated with Epstein.

Buckingham Palace has declined to comment on the allegations, reports the Guardian. A spokesperson said the royal household would not comment on ongoing legal matters, the report said.


That can is opening....

P.S

Paging BM Legal department....
There's been a photo of him with her that's been kicking around for years.

They'll bury this one no probs. It's Savile's involvement with Philip, Charles, Mountbatten that I want to see investigated.
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

according to Wikipedia *sigh* has vacationed in Thailand with HRH.

Thailand. Keeps popping up that place. Don't see the attraction myself. Noodles?
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

Sigh said:
according to Wikipedia *sigh* has vacationed in Thailand with HRH.

Thailand. Keeps popping up that place. Don't see the attraction myself. Noodles?
What else who'd go there for the lady boys or the young girls, noodles it is
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

-dabz- said:
andyhinch said:
Sigh said:
according to Wikipedia *sigh* has vacationed in Thailand with HRH.

Thailand. Keeps popping up that place. Don't see the attraction myself. Noodles?
What else who'd go there for the lady boys or the young girls, noodles it is
Gary Glitter gigs?
He could be a fan, who knows?
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

This could be interesting....
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

Senior police, BBC staff, council officials, civil servants and NHS staff are all virtually immune to any accountability and any inquiries into their alleged wrongdoings are virtually guaranteed to be a whitewash.

The establishment always closes ranks to protect its own and royals are about as establishment as you can get.
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

urmston said:
Senior police, BBC staff, council officials, civil servants and NHS staff are all virtually immune to any accountability and any inquiries into their alleged wrongdoings are virtually guaranteed to be a whitewash.

The establishment always closes ranks to protect its own and royals are about as establishment as you can get.

Didn't they have the law amended last year to grant new privacy for Royals. Coincidence I'm sure.
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

Hamann Pineapple said:
urmston said:
Senior police, BBC staff, council officials, civil servants and NHS staff are all virtually immune to any accountability and any inquiries into their alleged wrongdoings are virtually guaranteed to be a whitewash.

The establishment always closes ranks to protect its own and royals are about as establishment as you can get.

Didn't they have the law amended last year to grant new privacy for Royals. Coincidence I'm sure.
Yep, I think Prince Charles had it pushed through somehow.
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

-dabz- said:
Hamann Pineapple said:
urmston said:
Senior police, BBC staff, council officials, civil servants and NHS staff are all virtually immune to any accountability and any inquiries into their alleged wrongdoings are virtually guaranteed to be a whitewash.

The establishment always closes ranks to protect its own and royals are about as establishment as you can get.

Didn't they have the law amended last year to grant new privacy for Royals. Coincidence I'm sure.
Yep, I think Prince Charles had it pushed through somehow.

"Royal Family granted new right of secrecy "

"Special exemptions to be written into Freedom of Information Act"

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/royal-family-granted-new-right-of-secrecy-2179148.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 79148.html</a>

It was actually 2011. Remarkable foresight.
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

Hamann Pineapple said:
-dabz- said:
Hamann Pineapple said:
Didn't they have the law amended last year to grant new privacy for Royals. Coincidence I'm sure.
Yep, I think Prince Charles had it pushed through somehow.

"Royal Family granted new right of secrecy "

"Special exemptions to be written into Freedom of Information Act"

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/royal-family-granted-new-right-of-secrecy-2179148.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 79148.html</a>

It was actually 2011. Remarkable foresight.

Hmmmmm Really?
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

[bigimg]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/03/06/article-1363636-0D608B91000005DC-428_634x847.jpg[/bigimg]
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

The woman filed the case anonymously, and is understood to have been 17 at the time

Which is above the age of consent in the UK. Sorry I had to read the actual article and spoil your paedogeddon guys
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

If you read the story on virginia roberts it clearly states that there was no mention of Andrew having any sort of sexual relations with her. Just that he knows Jeffery epstein and met her. And even if he did, she was legal by the time they met. Non story.

Everyone put your tinfoil hats back on, no conspiracy to see here.
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

LongLang said:
If you read the story on virginia roberts it clearly states that there was no mention of Andrew having any sort of sexual relations with her. Just that he knows Jeffery epstein and met her. And even if he did, she was legal by the time they met. Non story.

Everyone put your tinfoil hats back on, no conspiracy to see here.
Thank you Bluemoons Royal Correspondant.
:)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top