Epstein / Prince Andrew / Maxwell

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

And what time period .if any. elapsed between recording and airing ?

It certainly wasn’t aired immediately as it was edited. I’d also assume that the BBC lawyers were all over it too.

 

[blue b4 the moon]

Sounds like he's trying to get off on a technicality?

Just a bit.

 

[bakerdave76]

I'm no law expert but
"My paedo pal has already paid her to shut the fuck up" doesn't sound like a great defence

 

[mat]

I'm no law expert but
"My paedo pal has already paid her to shut the fuck up" doesn't sound like a great defence

Indeed.

Shows his arrogance and sense of entitlement.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

A legal look at the Giuffre settlement agreement on which Prince Andrew is seeking to rely

5th January 2022 A happy new year to all the readers of this law and policy blog, and welcome back. Today’s post is about civil law – that is the law which (broadly) deals with the lega…

davidallengreen.com

Thank you for posting that, which has given me a far wider understanding of the wording of the agreement than I had previously. I have to say I’m less clear on the intention of the material clause than I was previously and fwiw therefore now feel the application to dismiss will almost certainly fail, as any benefit of doubt in relation to a clause will be given to the party not seeking to rely upon it.

So I’ve come round to your way of thinking (although via a slightly different route) @Fode N The Hole

A reminder (not that I really needed it) that you can’t form a worthwhile opinion based on part information. City and FFP being another case in point.

 

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

A reminder (not that I really needed it) that you can’t form a worthwhile opinion based on part information.

Complete and utter bullshit.


How do you think the overwhelming majority on here form theirs :)

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Complete and utter bullshit.


How do you think the overwhelming majority on here form theirs :)

tbf, we can all be guilty of it from time to time :-)

 

[meltonblue]

Thank you for posting that, which has given me a far wider understanding of the wording of the agreement than I had previously. I have to say I’m less clear on the intention of the material clause than I was previously and fwiw therefore now feel the application to dismiss will almost certainly fail, as any benefit of doubt in relation to a clause will be given to the party not seeking to rely upon it.

So I’ve come round to your way of thinking (although via a slightly different route) @Fode N The Hole

A reminder (not that I really needed it) that you can’t form a worthwhile opinion based on part information. City and FFP being another case in point.

Even with a lot of information, it can be difficult depending on the level of emotional investment with certain topics, city and ffp occasionally being an example of that too!

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Even with a lot of information, it can be difficult depending on the level of emotional investment with certain topics, city and ffp occasionally being an example of that too!

And how much time and the inclination you have to read it!

 

[bluemoon32]

Maxwell may have grounds for a mis-trial as one of the juros spoke to mail online and said that they were a victim of child abuse.
Sorry if already posted or if it's bullshit