Epstein / Prince Andrew / Maxwell

[Jam Tomorrow]

This was always going to be settled out of court, just surprised they didn’t call in Joe Pesci.

 

[Pedestrian]

The thing is I know GDM and I wouldn’t call him a toff, tbf my intellect has let me down in life, it’s why I never made it to the top I suppose.

I’ll base my opinion on what I perceive fella. Stop doffing your cap. Makes you look silly.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I’d say your first post seems to suggest you don’t think anything wrong was done? I must say I’m not shocked that someone of your alleged ilk thinks ‘shagging a seventeen year old ‘ is acceptable.

Firstly your deployment of the term “alleged ilk” marks you down as a spineless ****. If you’ve got something to say, then say it. You spineless ****.

Secondly, I haven’t defended him for shagging a seventeen year old and nor would I. The fact you’ve arrived at that conclusion based on what I’ve posted marks you as a bit simple. It was reprehensible and deserved censure and punishment. Unlike others, including you it would appear, however, I am capable of applying a degree of proportionality to this behaviour which falls far short of the absurdity of calling him a paedophile, which shagging a seveteen year old plainly does not make him. To suggest it does it preposterous.

Like I said, I don’t know a single mother who would cut their son off for such a thing, but perhaps you do. Maybe your mother feels differently.

There’s a difference between defending something and applying an objective and proportionate assement of what is a reasonable response to it in the circumstances. A mother cutting their son off should be reserved for far worse things than this.

So in summary, you are a bit simple and a spineless **** who is incapable of objective thought.

 

[andyhinch]

I’ll base my opinion on what I perceive fella. Stop doffing your cap. Makes you look silly.

You’re a bit odd aren’t you.

 

[Pedestrian]

Firstly your deployment of the term “alleged ilk” marks you down as a spineless ****. If you’ve got something to say, then say it. You spineless ****.

Secondly, I haven’t defended him for shagging a seventeen year old and nor would I. The fact you’ve arrived at that conclusion based on what I’ve posted marks you as a bit simple. It was reprehensible and deserved censure and punishment. Unlike others, including you it would appear, however, I am capable of applying a degree of proportionality to this behaviour which falls far short of the absurdity of calling him a paedophile, which shagging a seveteen year old plainly does not make him. To suggest it does it preposterous.

Like I said, I don’t know a single mother who would cut their son off for such a thing, but perhaps you do. Maybe your mother feels differently.

There’s a difference between defending something and applying an objective and proportionate assement of what is a reasonable response to it in the circumstances. A mother cutting their son off should be reserved for far worse things than this.

So in summary, you are a bit simple and a spineless **** who is incapable of objective thought.

Bla bla bla. Which is all you do. Fuck up you fake idiot. Keep calling me a **** though and you’ll find out I’m not fake.

 

[Uncle Wally One Ball]

Bla bla bla. Which is all you do. Fuck up you fake idiot. Keep calling me a **** though and you’ll find out I’m not fake.

snores

 

[Pedestrian]

You’re a bit odd aren’t you.

Nah. I’m relatively normal. Normal life. Normal job. I don’t feel the need to jump to the defence of apparent toffs on an Internet forum though. That I find ‘odd’. But you do you.

 

[Pedestrian]

snores

Blue moon mafia to the rescue. Get yourself off to bed grandad it’s late.

 

[andyhinch]

Nah. I’m relatively normal. Normal life. Normal job. I don’t feel the need to jump to the defence of apparent toffs on an Internet forum though. That I find ‘odd’. But you do you.

You’ve got a job ? Now that is a surprise.

 

[doots]

Popcorn cat time