Epstein / Prince Andrew / Maxwell

[kaz7]

I think he had to stick by the paedo as he had a load of shit on him,if they were in it together it was safety in numbers,Andrew is an intelligent man,why would he be seen with him after he admitted what he had done if he didn't fear what Epstein would say about him,i don't believe he killed himself either,as for the interview,it was a complete disaster,chuckling during one of his answers wtf,why haven't the media got the body language experts on it yet

 

[SWP's back]

Haven’t we all?

Speak for yourself my good man.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

We’ve all been friends with people who’ve turned out to be cunts. And we’re all guilty of being blind to our friends’ shortcomings from time to time.

Doesn’t mean he’s definitely culpable, but it don’t look great.

 

[aguerrrroooooooooooo]

We’ve all been friends with people who’ve turned out to be cunts. And we’re all guilty of being blind to our friends’ shortcomings from time to time.

Doesn’t mean he’s definitely culpable, but it don’t look great.

Pretty sure I've never been friends with someone who's run a sex ring before tbh

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Pretty sure I've never been friends with someone who's run a sex ring before tbh

Pretty sure isn’t sure.

 

[SWP's back]

Pretty sure I've never been friends with someone who's run a sex ring before tbh

Prude.

 

[aguerrrroooooooooooo]

Pretty sure isn’t sure.

Can't argue with that, certainly wouldn't have anything to do with them after they've been done for sex crimes though.

 

[aguerrrroooooooooooo]

 

[Sir peace frog]

Pretty sure I've never been friends with someone who's run a sex ring before tbh

I knew a lad at the airport, lovely lad(or so I thought), until he was caught in a pedo sting on you tube, we were all shocked

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Can't argue with that, certainly wouldn't have anything to do with them after they've been done for sex crimes though.

Depends what sex crimes. Would I abandon a close friend who’d exposed himself? Unless it was to kids, absolutely not. A sexual offence isn’t an inherently egregious sin. It greatly depends on the harm inflicted (directly or indirectly).