Epstein / Prince Andrew / Maxwell

[kaz7]

“Public displays of affection are something I do not do” - #PrinceAndrew #nonce

There are loads of pics in the papers,he also looks very sweaty lol

 

[happy daze]

There are loads of pics in the papers,he also looks very sweaty lol

Oh well that's it then must be guilty,thing is we don't know any of us and a judge and jury would be best placed to decide.

Still whilst we have the bluemoon court why would we need a system of law?

 

[denislawsbackheel]

Can’t even rely on Royal appointees to cover for him now.
Said he stayed with the New York consul general in 2001 when Giuffre claimed she was abused at Epstein’s house in NY.
The consul general says he has no memory of PA staying with him and that there is no mention in any of the official records.
Meanwhile at the time in 2001 the press said he was staying with his pal, Epstein.

 

[urban genie]

We all know he is a twat.

But is he saying here if he wasn't married he would be a nonce?




Vile fucker anyway, up there with hopkins on the levels of twattery

 

[journolud]

Abdicating personal responsibility

 

[jimharri]

 

[kaz7]

Oh well that's it then must be guilty,thing is we don't know any of us and a judge and jury would be best placed to decide.

Still whilst we have the bluemoon court why would we need a system of law?

Calm yer tits,he said he doesn't do pda's and he doesn't sweat,clearly he lied about both of them,as for the rest,i don't know

 

[jacko74]

Could you imagine if a family on the local estate had proven and undeniable links to at least two separate paedophiles? They'd be hounded out and their house left covered in graffiti and boarded up.
Yet somehow the family Windsor don't seem to be subject to this type of summary justice.

 

[PragueBlue]

Could you imagine if a family on the local estate had proven and undeniable links to at least two separate paedophiles? They'd be hounded out and their house left covered in graffiti and boarded up.
Yet somehow the family Windsor don't seem to be subject to this type of summary justice.

Nobody should be subject to that kind of 'justice'.

 

[Bellamy's Caddy]

Just thought I'd throw it out there that this appears to be a bit of a trial by media. I'm not saying he's done nowt wrong, but innocent until proven guilty seems to have gone out the window. Largely it seems because of jealousy at his position of privilege, and the assumption that trial by tabloid is suitable for the rich and famous.

It's an interesting point, as you say he hasn't been proven guilty of anything so there is an element of trial by media about this... I would counter that by looking at how he conducted himself during the interview (which he willingly took part in), he showed no empathy towards the victims and only seemed concerned at how his relationship with Epstein had impacted on the Royal family.

The needless and quite frankly embarrassing excuses (pizza express, sweating or not sweating etc) were laughable and ultimately he lost his official duties (whatever they were) due to being a liability who brought embarrassment on the Royal family and can't be trusted to represent the monarchy in a manner expected of someone in that position. It probably didn't help that by all accounts he ignored his advisors and went ahead with the interview against their better judgement. Had he been in a high profile position within government etc and conducted himself in this way its likely the end result would have been the same.

Media scrutiny certainly contributed to the decision for him to step down, but he chose to give that interview and had he handled it differently it would have been forgotten already.