Uncle Wally One Ball
Well-Known Member
What does that mean, who is he?E. Jean Caroll might have one ore two things to say about that.
What does that mean, who is he?E. Jean Caroll might have one ore two things to say about that.
She is trying to bring a historical rape case against a rich powerful white guy in the USA and not getting an easy ride in the courts.What does that mean, who is he?
How does that directly affect this matter?She is trying to bring a historical rape case against a rich powerful white guy in the USA and not getting an easy ride in the courts.
E Jean Carroll - latest news, breaking stories and comment - The Independent
It's just a current example of a rape case against a high profile rich white guy in the USA for reference. I'm basically saying the case against HRH is likely to go nowhere fast.How does that directly affect this matter?
Not because of the merit of the Giueffre case then, but because a lawyer in a different case altogether. Still don't follow your thinking here.It's just a current example of a rape case against a high profile rich white guy in the USA for reference. I'm basically saying the case against HRH is likely to go nowhere fast.
Tbh I struggle to understand how you prove consent or otherwise that long ago unless it's a statutory rape type thing based on her being below the age of consent?It's just a current example of a rape case against a high profile rich white guy in the USA for reference. I'm basically saying the case against HRH is likely to go nowhere fast.
In the E. Jean Caroll case she is seeking Trump's DNA to do a comparison with a 'sample' she already has (stain on a dress).Tbh I struggle to understand how you prove consent or otherwise that long ago unless it's a statutory rape type thing based on her being below the age of consent?
Possibly, but that would prove intimacy rather than any consent or lack of?In the E. Jean Caroll case she is seeking Trump's DNA to do a comparison with a 'sample' she already has (stain on a dress).
Not so sure what evidence there is in the Prince Andrew case unless there are witnesses (other girls that may have been there at the same time as Giuffre/Maxwell/other men who may have been granted immunity). Maybe Randy Andy has an 'intimate' birthmark?
I guess it just shows that historical rape allegations often boil down to he said/she said.Possibly, but that would prove intimacy rather than any consent or lack of?
The Met have dropped their investigation into Giuffre's allegations. Andrew is probably a dodgy **** but she is a serial liar too in my view.
I say . There was more chance of Fred Elliot winning the balon d'or than them pursuing that.
He'll be sharing a cell with Gerry McCann in the dungeons under Bluemoon Towers then.More damming from Andy's point of view is that the Bluemoon Crown Court has found him guilty on all counts.
You are assuming Lizzy will be around in June for the celebrations.....![]()
US judge sets deadline for Prince Andrew to answer questions under oath about sexual assault allegations
Under something known as "Mutual Legal Assistance" (MLA), both prosecutors and the lawyers acting for Ms Giuffre can issue a formal request for the prince to give evidence (known as a deposition) in the UK.news.sky.com
If he wasnt such a selfish **** he would do this now instead of it clashing with the queens celebrations in june but i bet he waits till the last possible minute
Have to hope so , i love her , even so he should do it now and not wait till she gets really sick or diesYou are assuming Lizzy will be around in June for the celebrations.....
I don't understand the middle bit. What does that mean?Maxwell on trail from Monday.
"Expert" on Times Radio confident she won't be found guilty. Expecting her case to follow the way her brothers did to avoid prosecution when their dad stole pensions.
Be interesting to see how well it covered.
I don't understand the middle bit. What does that mean?