F
F
failsworthblueboy
Guest
9.5 years is 114 months, isn't it?115 months. isn't it obvious?
9.5 years is 114 months, isn't it?115 months. isn't it obvious?
Snopes says “legend,” which has been “reported” numerous different ways over the years.reminds me of that (possible urban myth) story about someone in America buying a box of expensive cigars and insuring them. He then claimed against the policy stating he'd lost them in a series of 'small fires'.
Won the case.
Was then arrested for the 'deliberate arson' of insured property.
Jail time.
I'm currently in dipperpool, and the stench is overwhelming
suspected as much...still, never let facts get in the way of a good yarn...Snopes says “legend,” which has been “reported” numerous different ways over the years.
;-)
That’s the residents it’s omnipresentI'm currently in dipperpool, and the stench is overwhelming
What is the risk? Can it be insured? If not, why not?Love the commitment from the player, but why would the club give a contract that long considering the risks involved ?
Yes... but what about the piss?I'm currently in dipperpool, and the stench is overwhelming
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but if that deal concludes in July 2034, isn't it 115 months long?
You know it - Injuries/Sudden decline in form/lack of motivation/falling out with the manager, anything can happen. There is a reason why clubs don't do this. Chelsea had to buy too many players and amortize the transfer fees, so that was different.What is the risk? Can it be insured? If not, why not?
An episode short of a full picnic.Haaland and Pep must be moving in together like the Odd Couple (one for the kids); cigar includedView attachment 143367