Erling Haaland

[Rammy Blue]

I just wish for the first time, we actually flex our financial muscle and get this deal done.

Send a message out, whatever the cost.

 

[I'm Blue]

I just wish for the first time, we actually flex our financial muscle and get this deal done.

Send a message out, whatever the cost.

Seems like we’re wanting Erling to lift up his skirt and show us he wants it.
When we should just be wapping it out and showing what a big boy we are lol

 

[BlueBrain]

Honestly going for Haaland makes more sense strategically. It weakens Chelsea and gives us an amazing striker for years.

Chelsea cant get Kane so if we take Haaland off the market then they're stuck with no one...

City need to be smart here. Break the bank for the kid

 

[RandomJ]

I just wish for the first time, we actually flex our financial muscle and get this deal done.

Send a message out, whatever the cost.

Exactly. Especially when the alternative is dealing with Levy and his bullshit and him no doubt asking us for well north of £100 million for Kane.

 

[FantasyIreland]

I just wish for the first time, we actually flex our financial muscle and get this deal done.

Send a message out, whatever the cost.

Providing he wants to come,we cant take that for granted........but,yep,in a nutshell thats exactly what we should do.

Why be the richest club in the world and take all the shit for it,yet dont actually take advantage of it?

Get it fucking done City.

 

[Ashleymcduff]

If he wanted to come we would sign him , simply as that. Now stop crying over it and move on ffs.

or if you’re stupid enough to think we will still sign him get in the 40/1 for him to sign for us.

 

[I'm Blue]

If he wanted to come we would sign him , simply as that. Now stop crying over it and move on ffs.

or if you’re stupid enough to think we will still sign him get in the 40/1 for him to sign for us.

 

[FantasyIreland]

If he wanted to come we would sign him , simply as that. Now stop crying over it and move on ffs.

or if you’re stupid enough to think we will still sign him get in the 40/1 for him to sign for us.

There you have it folks.....the keyboard warrior has spoke!

 

[skillman]

Could it be something as simple as we’ve given our word to Kane and that’s that? We expect targets to do the same for us so we give players the same treatment. Maybe it helps future deals (trust wise) too rather than doing the dirty?

It could boil down to Pep simply believing Kane to Haaland as @domalino mentioned earlier. Or we’ve seen that Kane has shown he wants the move but EH hasn’t? No idea. Either way we’ll be getting a world class forward.

One issue, though, is that once one goes off the market then the selling club (Spurs or Dortmund) have the upper hand negotiating wise. You’d assume City know because if Chelsea get EH first, Spurs will up their price for Kane which could see us walking away.

It sounds like I’m flapping, I’m not, it just seems to make sense in my mind given how we’ve done business in recent years.

 

[Legal Alien]

I'll preface this by saying i would luv Haaland.

I think he's a great talent but it seems something has happened.
Maybe we got a bad vibe in talks? or with his agent and Dad flying around Spain? or maybe we saw enough of him in the two games against us to think he's not worth north of €150m yet? Or maybe his team got wind of us talking to Kane's team and then they lost interest in us? Who knows, it could be all or none, but it just feels like this isn't happening.

But if we end up with Kane, i really do think it will benefit our team more in the short term, because i think he fits our style of play a lot better and will score for fun in our team.
He is a quality striker who is proven in the PL, he's scored all sorts of goals in top level competiton for club and country over many seasons. He seems hungry to win also, so i think for the amount of money talked about he is less of a risk and i think we should get this done asap!