blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,457
Too expensive, they’d rather wait 12 months and save £75 mill ish.Why is nobody bidding then?
Too expensive, they’d rather wait 12 months and save £75 mill ish.Why is nobody bidding then?
Who says they’re not?Why is nobody bidding then?
You won’t save anything surely… when he’s officially available then there will be much more competition for him…Too expensive, they’d rather wait 12 months and save £75 mill ish.
Maybe maybe not. We probably won’t be involved anyway if we get Kane this summer. If not we might throw our hat in the ring next summer.You won’t save anything surely… when he’s officially available then there will be much more competition for him…
I don't know the exact figures but the summer before that they didn't spend a penny as they had a transfer banIf Chelsea beat us to him I don’t get it then. After spending so much last summer how they can spend so much and never get in trouble with ffp or whatever
Exactly. The "it's not my money" crew live in a fantasy world where football is not a business, FFP doesn't exist, and fans see all games live for free1.5 billion I believe is the total the club owe abramovich. So when you say the Club don't play silly twats, not strictly the club is it.
How much are you willing to pay for your season card to help fund those transfer fees
Thats quite harsh just because I have a different opinion.Fuck me you don't half come across as a twat. Have you joined to try and get a rise out of everyone on here?
Why on earth would the chairman read my posts? It's my opinion. Nothing more. We don't need Grealish. And I'd prefer a younger forward that Pep can train than an older one that goes against our recent transfer policy.
Thats quite harsh just because I have a different opinion.
We don't need Grealish, I agree.
I don't disagree about Haaland, just that the crazy money being