Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Chelsea are going to pay him more and I can't do anything about it.

"Jorginho joining Chelsea does not depend on Sarri [joining Chelsea]."

What about Sanchez, Fred, Pogba, Maguire, Van Dijk, etc? All turned us down for more money. That will play a major part in where Haaland goes next.



Jorginho joined Sarri for the same wages as he would have got here, because he wanted to continue playing under Sarri.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kun
"Chelsea are going to pay him more and I can't do anything about it.

"Jorginho joining Chelsea does not depend on Sarri [joining Chelsea]."

What about Sanchez, Fred, Pogba, Maguire, Van Dijk, etc? All turned us down for more money. That will play a major part in where Haaland goes next.


Er... no they didn't.

City refused to pay the transfer fees on all those players bar Sanchez, big difference.
 
We should go all out for him. The hardest thing to buy is goals and Haaland has them in abundance.

He’s a killer in front of the goal. Scores many with his first touch something quite rare right now in our team. Tall, quick, young and has a connection to City. Scores in Germany, scores in the champions league, scores for the national team. Think Haaland would be better for us than Mbappe.

If that means we need to pay £100m with another £20m to Raiola so be it. A generational striker is easily worth that.

There’s no better replacement for Aguero than Haaland.
 
Bundesliga and CL in 2020:

Pld: 24(6), Gls: 31, Ass: 4, Shots: 87, SOT: 47, SOT%: 54, Conversion rate: 35.6%, SOT Conversion rate: 66%.

Compared to Lewandowski since the start of 19/20:

Pld: 46(1), Gls: 69, Ass: 13, Shots: 255, SOT: 131, SOT%: 51.4, Conversion rate: 27.1%, SOT Conversion rate: 52.7%.
 
Jorginho joined Sarri for the same wages as he would have got here, because he wanted to continue playing under Sarri.
Not according to reports. Another rumour is he had no choice and Napoli said they would make him see out his 2 year contract unless he signed for Chelsea.
 
Can’t see us spending 100 million to get him. Hope I’m wrong but think we will go for the 60 million good player option as usual these days.
Hope I’m wrong
 
Er... no they didn't.

City refused to pay the transfer fees on all those players bar Sanchez, big difference.
And the players and their agent get a big slice of any signing on fee. If any of those players mentioned had their heart set on City they would have come.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.