Erling Haaland

[The Stockport Iniesta]

Wtf are people going on about Lukaku for in the Haaland thread? He's the opposite of a Pep player, shit technique, his 2nd touch is usually a tackle. City won't be signing the big lump, even if some of you rate him.

 

[PannickAtTheDisco]

Wtf are people going on about Lukaku for in the Haaland thread? He's the opposite of a Pep player, shit technique, his 2nd touch is usually a tackle. City won't be signing the big lump, even if some of you rate him.

it's silly season, where 4 or 5 names get talked about for 3 months and then we sign 3 completely different players.

 

[Tokyo32]

Wtf are people going on about Lukaku for in the Haaland thread? He's the opposite of a Pep player, shit technique, his 2nd touch is usually a tackle. City won't be signing the big lump, even if some of you rate him.

Please stop saying pep player. Anybody can be a pep player if pep is willing to work with the person and haaland is definitely not also a pep player if you want to go down that route

 

[The Stockport Iniesta]

Please stop saying pep player. Anybody can be a pep player if pep is willing to work with the person and haaland is definitely not also a pep player if you want to go down that route

Bollocks, Lukaku shit technique, shit work rate defensively, wrong age for a City signing, but if you have a hard on for Lukaku good for you. Now why don't you toddle off and start a Lukaku thread if one doesn't already exist and you can explain why he would be a good fit for City.

 

[jay laruja]

Wtf are people going on about Lukaku for in the Haaland thread? He's the opposite of a Pep player, shit technique, his 2nd touch is usually a tackle. City won't be signing the big lump, even if some of you rate him.

I'd argue that Haaland isn't a Pep player either. Not many strikers are. Pep expects advanced players to contribute heavily to the build-up which I haven't seen too much on Haaland. But don't get me wrong, Haaland is quality. I would love it if we got him next summer especially because it means that Pep has signed off on it and he thinks he can play well in his system.

 

[Georgian Maestro]

If we're getting Messi I think there's a big chance we give Aguero an extension so Messi can play with his mate. That surely is one of the things that makes us an attractive destination for him. This blocks any move for a big name striker for one year at least

 

[kun]

If we're getting Messi I think there's a big chance we give Aguero an extension so Messi can play with his mate. That surely is one of the things that makes us an attractive destination for him. This blocks any move for a big name striker for one year at least

Possibility of sending Jesus on loan in return for Haaland/Lukaku/whoever ?

 

[Ashleymcduff]

Wtf are people going on about Lukaku for in the Haaland thread? He's the opposite of a Pep player, shit technique, his 2nd touch is usually a tackle. City won't be signing the big lump, even if some of you rate him.

Same as haaland then , he ain’t a pep player.

 

[BlueRockape]

This threads gone to total shit

 

[Sir peace frog]

Lukaku is the cheap option, board again considering stick to that "max £65m strategy". Its extremely disappointing that we are even linked to him.

its not the boards fault we are linked with him, why is it a disappointment ? it doesn't actually mean something when a twitter poster links us with him, your life must be full of disappointments if you go off twitter.
your full of shit when it comes to transfers, i haven't forgotten the outrage at not signing koub or kounde , and having to settle for dias.