I do think people need to be a bit wary of this side of things. Particularly those who begrudge our current forwards for not scoring when there's no supply.
The thing with an out and out goal getter in a team like ours is, they'll only ever be involved at the last minute. In theory they could still do good work off the ball in terms of creating space and defensive work, but as far as build up play is concerned you'll often rarely see them. So when the team is struggling to create chances, having an out and out forward not contributing is only going to make things more difficult for the rest of the team.
This isn't an argument against Haaland, more against the general idea that we desperately need an out and out goalscorer. There WOULD be games where having a player like that is extremely beneficial, but there WOULD be games where it wouldn't.
Now in Haaland's case, he's such an extremely good goal getter that the positives outweigh the negatives by a landslide. Even if he were the worst fit in the world you'd still want him just for that goalscoring quality. But I think people need to prepare themselves for the reality that is sometimes he would be extremely frustrating and whatnot. Especially given his age.
If Pep sticks around long enough, he might be able to coach him into being something of a complete striker not too dissimilar to what Aguero was like back in 17/18, or in his earlier City days. So potential Haaland problems might disappear after not too long.