EL APACHE TEVEZ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 23,366
Surely not?
It’s on again well well
Surely not?
Surely not?
You keep calling sources things that aren’t sourcesAll Spanish sources saying Madrid
British, German and Portuguese saying City.
So who's wrong hmm.
Surely not?
It is Sky, not some poxy local independent journo.People really going to discuss this lol
Really? He’s reportedly on £410k per week at the mo, I’m sure PSG have offered him a substantial pay rise, so what makes you think he’ll be getting less at Madrid, who have been paying £650k per week?My (firm) guess is this is more than Mbappe will be getting at Madrid, and only PSG (who aren’t in the race) could match it
Make it 200 ;)if he doesn't sign you owe me 100,000 quid mate. mortgaging my house right now
You arePeople really going to discuss this lol
The release clause will presumably be higher than his current one & even if it’s not & it’s exactly the same, we’ll still make profit from an accountancy perspective if I understand correctly how transfers have a book value across the length of the contractIf you he release clause Is too small then we need to look into whether it’s in our interests to sign him .
My friend, it’s never the vehicle and always the journalist. That’s how you can laugh at Marca — you see who’s writing their articles and laugh at their history. I actually went on their (SkySport DE) website. They have an article at the top about Haaland to City that doesn’t even mention Kane. I tried to find anything about Harry Kane posted in the last few days and there is nothing there. I don’t know where CityXtra found this, I’m guessing from a third aggregator from a pundit that may have mentioner something on that channel. I’d even guess the context: probably talking about Fjortoft’s Bayern “news” from yesterday. But they have so much faith on it that they didn’t bother putting up on their website, lol. Even the context is absurd: City would make a new attempt at signing Kane in the summer and if that doesn’t work they would try Haaland. Can anyone seriously believe that? That the club would think, well, if Kane doesn’t work we could just try the biggest transfer in many years at the last minute? Not to mention that even if Kane still wanted to leave (and I don’t think he will want a move before the World Cup at this point), he would cost far more than Haaland. Or that everything you have heard even from reputable journalists that cover our club has been a farce? Where to begin?It is Sky, not some poxy local independent journo.
Guess there’s always the Sky Bet angle with them, though.
Do you think Mbappe is leaving PSG for the money? They’d easily give him more than Madrid if he wantedReally? He’s reportedly on £410k per week at the mo, I’m sure PSG have offered him a substantial pay rise, so what makes you think he’ll be getting less at Madrid, who have been paying £650k per week?
Not saying you’re wrong btw as you’re guessing, as I am, just don’t understand why you’d guess he’d get less than 500k per week at Real?
Nope, definitely not leaving for the money & I agree that PSG could potentially offer more to stay depending on their accounts & ffpDo you think Mbappe is leaving PSG for the money? They’d easily give him more than Madrid if he wanted
Same. 100% have Kane if Haaland didn't choose us.I like Kane. Yes I know I'm in the minority. But I definitely wouldn't be taking him over Haaland!