They're very similar. Despite Ramires' size he is a destroyer. In fact the main issue we have with him is that he makes overly hard tackles and gets himself sent off. They both recover the ball and drive it forward with speed and break up play in midfield. They also get right in behind the CB's when necessary, in fact they can both play CB in emergencies. They're not really DMC's because they do a lot in attack as well - but the function they play in Chelsea is similar.razinho said:I'm not questioning you on this seeing as you see them a lot more than i do but i don't really see the two as similar players apart from the fact they play in midfield. Ramires is a stick compared to Essien and, arguably, they're miles apart talent wise as well.
Essien is in a different class to Ramires at this time like I said, but we got him as his successor/backup I feel and that decision is starting to look a lot wiser with this chronic knee injury beginning to really take its toll. We need a CM, but we don't need to replace Essien specifically. We had a CM deficiency before this injury flared up again, hence the assault on Spurs for Modric.
If Ramires took a serious injury before Essien recovered however, we'd be in a world of trouble because that'd leave us without a midfield engine.