Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,443
Seems a bit petty of ASM. They can just add 1k more seats to the current plans for the Co-op Live, have them hidden and wait until the AO Arena revamp is finished. That'll show um.
If the news from the Old Toilet is to be believed, they will be excluded until they’re done I reckon…Will be interesting to see what the new FFP rules or whatever the replacement is called has on Stadium development.
Infrastructure costs used to be excluded so you could basically pump money in, not sure if that will be the case with new rules.
Sounds like The Empire Stae Building / Chrysler thing.Seems a bit petty of ASM. They can just add 1k more seats to the current plans for the Co-op Live, have them hidden and wait until the AO Arena revamp is finished. That'll show um.
ASM Global, the operator of the 27-year-old city-centre venue, is pushing ahead with redevelopment plans in response to the creation of a rival £300m arena in Eastlands.
When both indoor arenas are redeveloped and built, Manchester will have the 2 biggest capacity indoor arenas in Europe.
The £50m project will “dramatically enhance” the venue and boost its capacity from 21,000 to 24,000, ensuring it remains the largest arena in the city.
View attachment 41637
![]()
Summer start for £50m revamp of Manchester's AO Arena - Place North West
ASM Global, the operator of the 27-year-old city-centre venue, is pushing ahead with redevelopment plans.www.placenorthwest.co.uk
Seems a bit petty of ASM. They can just add 1k more seats to the current plans for the Co-op Live, have them hidden and wait until the AO Arena revamp is finished. That'll show um.
Sounds like The Empire Stae Building / Chrysler thing.
Upon learning that the Empire State would be 1,000 feet tall, Chrysler changed his plans a final time and fixed a stainless steel spire to the top of his skyscraper. The addition saw the Chrysler Building soar to a record 1,048 feet, but unfortunately for Chrysler, Raskob and Smith simply went back to the drawing board and returned with an even taller design for the Empire State Building. When completed in 1931, the colossus loomed 1,250 feet over the streets of Midtown Manhattan. It would remain the world’s tallest building for nearly 40 years until the completion of the first World Trade Center tower in 1970.
It is very like the Empire State/Chrysler thing because big acts will only play one venue, in the same way tourists go to the tallest building in the world, not the second tallest.
ASM obviously think that by having 3,000 more seats they will be more attractive than the COOP and they'll win the war.
The problem with that obviously is that Silver Lake have $100Bn behind them, and if they need to operate at a loss to get the big acts to come for a few years they will, and by then MEN will be bankrupt unless something drastic changes.
It's all a bit undignified.
I haven't been to the Manchester arena,so don't know the AO. However building design will play a big part, I know the Glasgow Hydro, is much more adaptable than the old Glasgow SECC so is easier for different types of events, and can close off sections easier for smaller capacity events.It also has far better acoustics which will sway bands too.It’s not 3000 more, it’s 500 more.
AO Arena, 24,000 after refurb.
Coop Live Arena, 23,500 after construction.
It’s more symbolic than anything else. ASM Global want the AO Arena to remain the biggest indoor arena in the UK. (and in Europe) An extra 500 seats won’t sway artists.
Capacity aside, the Coop Live Arena will be brand new, state of the art. Artists and acts will want to play there initially because it‘s a new indoor arena.
Which one, it's hard to make out;-)Here it is, City-style. I'm on the fence..
Yep I spotted that, that's why it seemed petty and I said they could just add 1k more to the build and keep it hush. It was a little tongue in cheek because I'm not sure how much it matters when the difference is that small either tbh. It would be funny, if they did pull a fast one on them though.It’s not 3000 more, it’s 500 more.
AO Arena, 24,000 after refurb.
Coop Live Arena, 23,500 after construction.
It’s more symbolic than anything else. ASM Global want the AO Arena to remain the biggest indoor arena in the UK. (and in Europe) An extra 500 seats won’t sway artists.
Capacity aside, the Coop Live Arena will be brand new, state of the art. Artists and acts will want to play there initially because it‘s a new indoor arena.
Yep I spotted that, that's why it seemed petty and I said they could just add 1k more to the build and keep it hush. It was a little tongue in cheek because I'm not sure how much it matters when the difference is that small either tbh. It would be funny, if they did pull a fast one on them though.
I haven't been to the Manchester arena,so don't know the AO. However building design will play a big part, I know the Glasgow Hydro, is much more adaptable than the old Glasgow SECC so is easier for different types of events, and can close off sections easier for smaller capacity events.It also has far better acoustics which will sway bands too.
I'm assuming all this has been thought of and incorporated into the Coop arena and will be difficult for the old AO to compete with.
Arena semantics here and I have worked in quite a few venues over the past 10 years, but I think there will be a decent spilt between them and both venues will survive, acts playing at the current Arena normally sign a contract to do the ASM venues so will do a combination of Leeds, Newcastle, Hull, Wembley Arena, Hydro and then add on other venues if needed,
The Co-Op will draw a lot of stand alone and one off events both venues and will get events that wouldn't be possible at the other venue (Horse show anyone?)
I think Manchester Central (G-MEX) will feel a hit too in the years to come, especially if/ when a hotel is built on site as the floor footprint and designed bar lay out would make it perfect for conferences.
Been in hospitality at Spurs couple of times. Good range of beers in real pint pots and cheaper than most places in Manchester city centreDoes anyone know why we (or any stadium I can think of) hasn’t gone for the magnetised automatic pint dispensing system that Spurs have? Seems a no brainer - better atmosphere, quicker service, more revenue. 5 seconds per pint is crazy.
Also, saw a video recently that said Spurs are making 3 million profit per home game. Obviously that’s off the back of higher prices which I hope we avoid, but that’s massive.
Cant be better than the beer at City, it's truly delightful stuff.Been in hospitality at Spurs couple of times. Good range of beers in real pint pots and cheaper than most places in Manchester city centre
Does anyone know why we (or any stadium I can think of) hasn’t gone for the magnetised automatic pint dispensing system that Spurs have? Seems a no brainer - better atmosphere, quicker service, more revenue. 5 seconds per pint is crazy.
Also, saw a video recently that said Spurs are making 3 million profit per home game. Obviously that’s off the back of higher prices which I hope we avoid, but that’s massive.
They're not resting.They're not dead, they're just resting.
I somehow doubt that its £3m profit more like that's turnoverDoes anyone know why we (or any stadium I can think of) hasn’t gone for the magnetised automatic pint dispensing system that Spurs have? Seems a no brainer - better atmosphere, quicker service, more revenue. 5 seconds per pint is crazy.
Also, saw a video recently that said Spurs are making 3 million profit per home game. Obviously that’s off the back of higher prices which I hope we avoid, but that’s massive.
