UEFA would have enormous problems if it were to find such an idea acceptable. It claimed that its recent financial regulations, allegedly to establish a "level playing field", were immediately attacked as being anti-competitive, and at the last count there were 9 different actions against them going through the courts. This masques the fact that, if FFPR were intended to halt City's progress, UEFA hasn't managed to enact any form of words which can do that without making life difficult for all "elite" clubs. The answer certainly doesn't lie in this scheme. The CL is, from the legal point of view, no more than a market, to which this idea would almost allow privileged access to some clubs. Some other clubs would be allowed to compete on a different basis (being good at football) while others would not be allowed into the market at all. This would interest the commercial lawyers again. As a sporting competition it would not be fair since some clubs would be excluded because they were neither "big" enough nor good enough, other clubs would be invited only if the were good enough while a third group would be in every year only because they were "big" enough, or had been successful at some time in the past. Defining "bigness" would be a fascinating business - 8 teams have won the CL since 2000, which would be a sizeable increas in the size of the competition. The complication would be that teams like Arsenal and City would have to compete over 38 games in the PL whereas United, Liverpool and Chelsea could rest players to prepare for CL games. The reaction of the PL and the FA to this debasing of the PL and to its implications for the TV deal would be interesting. Juventus would not be given automatic entry despite being by far the best Italian team in recent years, but AC and Inter would. How do you define "major" to include Juventus but not Ajax, Marseille, Red Star Belgrade, PSV etc etc. How "big" do they want the tournament to be? And if City win it before 2018....