Jul 24, 2019 at 10:04
#41
robinamicrowave
Wanted to be bran, ended up being littlefinger
Joined: Jul 29, 2013
Messages:
2,060
Supports:Man City
We're owned by dickheads and I honestly think some of our fans would thank the club for a slap on the face as they entered the stadium. "Wow, just a slap on the face to watch
this team? Count me in!" The lengths some of them go to in order to defend the club makes me sad really. As much as I think it's unfair for journalists, not just McGeehan, to lump us in with the criticisms of our ownership, I think some of our fans are unwilling to apply critical thought to who our owners really are, and how they're currently part of something sinister going on at the very top of the game. The guy who decides the prices of our season tickets, Ferran Soriano, drives through one of the poorest areas in the country when he makes his visits to the Etihad, but the prices have increased by nearly 100% since we first won the league back in 2012.
There's a serious disconnect between who our fans are and who our owners think should be in the Etihad. The "Emptihad" stuff is vastly overstated but we don't sell out home games for that reason. We've never been a major international brand like United, and arguably we still aren't. We've always relied on local people for support, or being everybody's second favourite, but when the people local to our stadium are dirt poor and can't afford to pick up a habit like football, we're doing the opposite of helping them inside by trying to become such a massive brand. I don't think we're unique in this regard because most of the top teams in Europe have had to feck people over to get where they are, but it wouldn't sting so much if so many of our fans didn't take the "I'm alright, Jack" attitude - both with regards to season ticket pricing and the (ahem) "dealings" of our owners.
The responsibility isn't on the fans to oust the Sheikh from the club. That's impossible. But if they could just put tribalism to the side for a
second then we might be able to have a reasonable discussion with these journalists. As far as I'm concerned the likes of Delaney and McGeehan are only bothered because it generates a lot of traffic for their sites, but Rabin isn't a paid investigator acting on behalf of ADUG. He's just a weirdo with a Twitter account and a lot of time on his hands. But now Rabin's doing to Delaney, et al, what they were doing to him - in the end they're just normal blokes working for a newspaper. At worst, they're hypocrites, they're not being to spread propaganda either. He was pretty funny at first but he's turned it into such a big deal - at least in the circles we all move in - that it's become impossible to have a discussion about any of it. I hope it all blows over soon because it's gotten pretty boring now.