Gray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 May 2004
- Messages
- 25,455
- Team supported
- ABU & The Bus Wreckers
Can't be strictly true as nothing appears to have been done about the "Crouch Eye Gouge".Prestwich_Blue said:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
FA Charges?
- Thread starter Gray
- Start date
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
They're "looking at it" apparently according to reports.Gray said:Can't be strictly true as nothing appears to have been done about the "Crouch Eye Gouge".Prestwich_Blue said:Yes. They watch Sky Sports News the next day and see if there's anything on there they need to do something about.Gray said:Does any body know how the FA go about charging a player retrospectively.
Berkovic_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 1,266
Gray said:Does any body know how the FA go about charging a player retrospectively.
Is it one person that makes the decision, if so who is it?
Or is it a panel that sit down after the weekend fixtures and watch Sky Sports News whilst reading the gutter press to see who the media think they should bring up on a charge?
I think they have a duty to the paying public to let us know how this procedure works.
It's this one.
Sigh
Well-Known Member
Lets see if they do owt about Stephen Warnock's despicable "tackle" on Saturday.
Hello? Hello? Sky? Burley? Talk Shite? Hello?
Hello? Hello? Sky? Burley? Talk Shite? Hello?
WythyBlue32
Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2012
- Messages
- 16
Balti said:Gray said:Does any body know how the FA go about charging a player retrospectively.
Is it one person that makes the decision, if so who is it?
Or is it a panel that sit down after the weekend fixtures and watch Sky Sports News whilst reading the gutter press to see who the media think they should bring up on a charge?
I think they have a duty to the paying public to let us know how this procedure works.
in the real world a person is innocent until proven guilty
which would be impossible in this case
so the procedure is to
1/ see if it's MCFC
2/ note the medja witch hunt
3/ listen to Harry dodgy tax evader hypocritically telling the FA what to do
4/ Ignore previous precedent like Huddlestone example? (Refer to 1).
5/ Ban the fucker.
6/ Sing glory glory. My old man etc
^^^^^^
This is probably the most accurate .
mcmanus
Well-Known Member
Yep watch SSN and read tabliods
Then scream WITCH at the City player who's turn it is this weekend. The Hunt begins.
No 4 match ban they are putting Mario in a barrel and tossing him the river Thames. If he dosen't drown then he must be guilty.
Then scream WITCH at the City player who's turn it is this weekend. The Hunt begins.
No 4 match ban they are putting Mario in a barrel and tossing him the river Thames. If he dosen't drown then he must be guilty.