lefty goldblatt
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Jul 2012
- Messages
- 5,862
It was only Villa tbf ;)Well played, Stevenage.
Slightly different rule but read through this Dale Johnson Twitter thread, this has been going on for a while now, several examples going back 5 years ago.
However, he does say, like most us think it’s not in the spirit of the game.
Rodri, came from behind Mings v Villa but Mings had control of the ball, how far would he be able to run before Rodri could make a legitimate challenge? I didn’t see anything wrong with that but the outcry because it was City lead to a change in the rules. This latest incident should definitely show what a poor rule this is and amend it.
The Rodri rule change had nothing to do with the interpretation of the Salah goal offside, seriously, it’s been a misnomer for several years now.As a city fan the villa/rodri incident should never be a goal. It’s embarrassing for the game (taking city out of it). As is the Salah goal. I played football at a semi decent level. I cant believe anyone who did similar thinks either incident should be a goal
They also apprently changed the interpretation after the city/villa controversy. Not that youd know that after the Salah goal
Chaos. If that gate was opened fully at the full time whistle, there would have been fatalities that day…..I wonder what sort of welcome they got down in the valleys? I remember City going there in the cup at the height of the "Forward with Franny" fiasco. By all accounts, it was a hairy afternoon.