FA Cup Games 16/17/18/19 Feb,replays 27/28th

pudge said:
Savage is an idiot.

It's always been the rule, as far as I'm aware. You can't stop altogether on your run up, there's a difference in a stutter.

Who's the other pro-Spurs **** in the gantry?

You don't need VAR for that call.
Click to expand...
Didn't see the pen incident pal - but this is from the FA guidlines...

Feinting in the run-up to take a penalty kick to confuse opponents is permitted as part of football. However, feinting to kick the ball once the player has completed his run-up is considered an infringement of Law 14 and an act of unsporting behaviour for which the player must be cautioned.

Not sure if this clarifies it or not. I'd personally consider a feint to be a more of a sideways move during the run-up rather than the action of stopping.
 
Last edited:
super_city_si said:
Why 3-1? Rightly ruled out the penalty. He stopped. Can’t do that.
Click to expand...
I don't think it should have been a penalty personally he clearly waited until he was in the penalty area to go down, running 5 yards to do so, proving he was strong enough to stay on his feet when it suited him. Free kick that, it's another example of conning the ref into a different decision with dishonest play.
 
steviemc said:
Didn't see the pen incident pal - but this is from the FA guidlines...

Feinting in the run-up to take a penalty kick to confuse opponents is permitted as part of football. However, feinting to kick the ball once the player has completed his run-up is considered an infringement of Law 14 and an act of unsporting behaviour for which the player must be cautioned.

Not sure if this clarifies it or not. I'd personally consider a feint to be a more of a sideways move during the run-up rather than the action of stopping.
Click to expand...
Because Son stops completely this is classed as completing his run up, the ref was correct. As for the 8 players encroaching that's another matter.
 
it's brilliant. Rochdale would wrongly already be out if not for VAR and it's great we have a system that helps neutralise bias, reputation and pressure and treats the likes of Rochdale and Huddersfield the same as the rags and Spurs. Spurs would have been through due to the ref turning a blind eye during normal rules and they've got away with it all season, it's fantastic that so far at least they're being held to account and can't get away with it.
 
So Spurs should have another goal but Lamela should definitely be off... first one was a red on it's own and now should have had a second yellow.
 
Metalartin said:
I don't think it should have been a penalty personally he clearly waited until he was in the penalty area to go down, running 5 yards to do so, proving he was strong enough to stay on his feet when it suited him. Free kick that, it's another example of conning the ref into a different decision with dishonest play.
Click to expand...

My opinion as well. He rode the challenge waiting until he was in the area before falling to the floor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.