Gray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 May 2004
- Messages
- 28,753
- Team supported
- ABU & The Bus Wreckers
Millwall player who scored must have a bet on Palace.
Not necessarily.I quite like it. It prevents any kind of controversial goals following a handball. Score with your hand? Overturned no matter what. Score immediately after handling the ball? Overturned no matter what. Removes subjectivity.
even weirder is that it's OK to hit an attacker's arm/hand too, only not if it leads directly to a goal is it penalised.I'll never understand this new thing of, If the ball hits off a defenders arm accidentally then play continues, If the ball hits off an attackers arm accidentally it's a free kick.
Accidental is accidental, It can't be one rule for one and a different for another.
I think it's a crazy rule personally.
Ok, so I was wrong with the "any kind" remark, but that was simply because there wasn't any clear evidence to support either way, so must go with on-field decision. In these VAR-days, should we really allow a goal to be scored directly following it being handled?Not necessarily.
Haaland v Tottenham midweek caused nothing but debate. That goal wasn't awarded yet it didn't even hit his arm.
Obviously people are going to have different views on it, Personally I'd love to see handball awarded for intentional handball situations, This whole thing of the ball hitting an attackers arm down by his side from half a yard away from being kicked at him is ridiculous.
It was a Millwall player that passed itI thought not offside if ball is deliberately played by the defender. The ball deflected off defender. Therefore offside?
Yes but it was deliberately cleared by another defender and it just so happened to hit him.I thought not offside if ball is deliberately played by the defender. The ball deflected off defender. Therefore offside?
Yeah, I've thought about the exact same thing since I posted and concluded much as you did that footballers are such a bunch of cheating "play dead"-ers that he probably couldn't win either way.Agree to a certain point but there’s that much simulation it makes sense to use all your available tools to ensure such a big decision is correct.
Millwall fans never changed do they?
ThanksIt was a Millwall player that passed it
They ended up giving it on the pitch after the linesman and referee talked.Without VAR football would be screwed. It’s either the assistant ref is blind or he doesn’t know the rules or both (I wouldn’t put it past him)
I think his first instinct was to award a penalty to Liverpool and then send off an Arsenal player so he probably got confused when he saw the shirt colours on the pitch.Yeah, I've thought about the exact same thing since I posted and concluded much as you did that footballers are such a bunch of cheating "play dead"-ers that he probably couldn't win either way.
I just have an issue with his initial onfield decision.
Surely he's got to think "that looked a bit dangerous", issue a red and THEN VAR steps in.
But it's Olivar, sooooooooooooooooooooo...