Explained now. Cheers. Like a good conspiracy me.1 Coventry
2 Rags
3 Chelsea
4 Us
I'm no conspiracy theorist but we didn't see the other side of the balls. It wouldn't have been that difficult to switch them during that shambles. I'm not suggesting it happened, but it's not impossible.Apparently, the numbers were on the BBC website before the draw. Not everything is a conspiracy, you know?
But it doesn't go by order of ties played!Did anyone know the numbers. Order should be Cov.1 us 2 Chavs3 rags 4 going by order of play. Fishy to me.
They did disclose the numbers before the draw, just not on TV. There are a few links to the BBC website already posted in this thread. And it's also already been explained that the ball numbers weren't alphabetically determined but were organised based on the order they came out in the QF draw.You have to question the logic here....
City should have been ball 4 and not 3.
Manchester United comes after Manchester City alphabetically,
United should have been 4 becaise they were the last team to qualify.....
How did City become ball 3 and United 4?
Just nore this.... they never disclosed the ball numbers before the draw, just let that sink in, Had they already decided who Coventry were going to play behind the scenes?
Chelsea has far more talent on its team than United. Sure, it has underachieved this season, but almost all of its underlying numbers are good and indicate that they should have far more points than they do.They’re 11th in the league. We underachieved drawing with them twice.
Also, the game will follow a big European game and we’ll be a bit weaker if we’ve involved. Rather face Chelsea slightly under strength than United.