Bluemanc100
Well-Known Member
Liverpool got Milner for free??
Joe Hart £600,000??
Not really..... he got a fat wad into his sky rocket I'm sure....... Players dont do anything for free
What you mean is City got nothing
Liverpool got Milner for free??
Joe Hart £600,000??
Liverpool got Milner for free??
Joe Hart £600,000??
Can't get a better England international for 8 mil
Hart wasn't an English international.
True, although wasn't Miner's singing on fee absurdly high? I heard £10m quoted? Not exactly "free".Liverpool got Milner for free??
Joe Hart £600,000??
milners 30 delph 25 rather have delph59883738 said you can't get a better England International for £8M, I simply named two
Liverpool got Milner for free??
Joe Hart £600,000??
end of
Liverpool got Milner for free??
Joe Hart £600,000??
I've seen more exciting transfers at City than Delph .
If he's as good as Gareth Barry I will be happy .
Only reason we have him is because of that home grown rule .
59883738 said you can't get a better England International for £8M, I simply named two
when where there rules to this?
Liverpool got Milner for free??
Joe Hart £600,000??
Agreed....
Plus...I didn't hear villa bitching or dragging his name through the mud despite the fact they won't be happy with the fee
We've got 17 foreign players, so we need to work a 1 in 1 out policy when signing those. We've got very few homegrown players, Hart, Clichy, Wright. That's it. So, clearly, we're going to be adding some of them to the squad. Sterling, hopefully, will be one. However who else do we bring in? Saying we should add Aranguiz instead of Delph simply doesn;t work, the "British passport" is vitally important. I think Delph, at 25 and an international, is a good player currently, and has real potential to improve, especially surrounded with world class players. Maybe I'll concede Milner was better than Delph, but by so much that signing Delph is a mistake? Not for me. It's not as if we have Milner still as an alternative.