Fact of the day : Some octopuses have been known ...

Bigga said:
Bad grammar, really.

It SHOULD be 'octopodes' when the plural is indicated, but whatever...
Nope.

There are three plural forms of octopus: octopuses, octopi, and octopodes. Currently, octopuses is the most common form in the UK as well as the US; octopodes is rare, and octopi is often objectionable.

The Oxford English Dictionary lists octopuses, octopi and octopodes (in that order); it labels octopodes "rare", and notes that octopi derives from the mistaken assumption that octōpūs is a second declension Latin noun, which it is not.
 
another generation said:
Bigga said:
Bad grammar, really.

It SHOULD be 'octopodes' when the plural is indicated, but whatever...
Nope.

There are three plural forms of octopus: octopuses, octopi, and octopodes. Currently, octopuses is the most common form in the UK as well as the US; octopodes is rare, and octopi is often objectionable.

The Oxford English Dictionary lists octopuses, octopi and octopodes (in that order); it labels octopodes "rare", and notes that octopi derives from the mistaken assumption that octōpūs is a second declension Latin noun, which it is not.

Wrong.

'Octopus' is GREEK not Latin, so the CORRECT plural would have been 'Octopode' as I indicated. But it has been in use here as English, which is why the dictionary accepts 'octopuses' as standard.

Sorry chum.
 
Bigga said:
another generation said:
Bigga said:
Bad grammar, really.

It SHOULD be 'octopodes' when the plural is indicated, but whatever...
Nope.

There are three plural forms of octopus: octopuses, octopi, and octopodes. Currently, octopuses is the most common form in the UK as well as the US; octopodes is rare, and octopi is often objectionable.

The Oxford English Dictionary lists octopuses, octopi and octopodes (in that order); it labels octopodes "rare", and notes that octopi derives from the mistaken assumption that octōpūs is a second declension Latin noun, which it is not.

Wrong.

'Octopus' is GREEK not Latin, so the CORRECT plural would have been 'Octopode' as I indicated. But it has been in use here as English, which is why the dictionary accepts 'octopuses' as standard.

Sorry chum.
Where did I quote that it was Latin? I'll let you go and correct the OED, Wikipedia, etc, if you want.
 
another generation said:
Bigga said:
another generation said:

Wrong.

'Octopus' is GREEK not Latin, so the CORRECT plural would have been 'Octopode' as I indicated. But it has been in use here as English, which is why the dictionary accepts 'octopuses' as standard.

Sorry chum.
Where did I quote that it was Latin? I'll let you go and correct the OED, Wikipedia, etc, if you want.

I guess you missed your own quotations...
 
Bigga said:
another generation said:
Bigga said:
Wrong.

'Octopus' is GREEK not Latin, so the CORRECT plural would have been 'Octopode' as I indicated. But it has been in use here as English, which is why the dictionary accepts 'octopuses' as standard.

Sorry chum.
Where did I quote that it was Latin? I'll let you go and correct the OED, Wikipedia, etc, if you want.

I guess you missed your own quotations...

I think it's you who needs to read the quotation again.

"The Oxford English Dictionary lists octopuses, octopi and octopodes (in that order); it labels octopodes "rare", and notes that octopi derives from the mistaken assumption that octōpūs is a second declension Latin noun, which it is not."

AG never said it was Latin and all the OED has noted is that Octupi derives from the MISTAKEN ASSUMPTION that Octopus is Latin.
 
sjk2008 said:
Bigga said:
another generation said:
Where did I quote that it was Latin? I'll let you go and correct the OED, Wikipedia, etc, if you want.

I guess you missed your own quotations...

I think it's you who needs to read the quotation again.

"The Oxford English Dictionary lists octopuses, octopi and octopodes (in that order); it labels octopodes "rare", and notes that octopi derives from the mistaken assumption that octōpūs is a second declension Latin noun, which it is not."

AG never said it was Latin and all the OED has noted is that Octupi derives from the MISTAKEN ASSUMPTION that Octopus is Latin.
Whoever's right or wrong, it still looks like an exploding pair of knackers.
 
Dubbery working his magic once again



0,,10273~11166098,00.jpg
 
sjk2008 said:
Bigga said:
another generation said:
Where did I quote that it was Latin? I'll let you go and correct the OED, Wikipedia, etc, if you want.

I guess you missed your own quotations...

I think it's you who needs to read the quotation again.

"The Oxford English Dictionary lists octopuses, octopi and octopodes (in that order); it labels octopodes "rare", and notes that octopi derives from the mistaken assumption that octōpūs is a second declension Latin noun, which it is not."

AG never said it was Latin and all the OED has noted is that Octupi derives from the MISTAKEN ASSUMPTION that Octopus is Latin.

A fair point.

Multi-tasking can be a b*tch...
 
Bigga said:
sjk2008 said:
Bigga said:
I guess you missed your own quotations...

I think it's you who needs to read the quotation again.

"The Oxford English Dictionary lists octopuses, octopi and octopodes (in that order); it labels octopodes "rare", and notes that octopi derives from the mistaken assumption that octōpūs is a second declension Latin noun, which it is not."

AG never said it was Latin and all the OED has noted is that Octupi derives from the MISTAKEN ASSUMPTION that Octopus is Latin.

A fair point.

Multi-tasking can be a b*tch...

No problem, chum.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.