Haha a 'diving racist cannibal'! Probably a fair description!Hart of the matter said:8 game ban last season, another big ban heading his way again (probably well in to next season). Was banned in Holland for 7 games when he bit a player. Apart from being a diving, racist cannibal, he Is a publicity nightmare. To bite once is rare, to do it again suggests an inbuilt impulse (schema) that will happen again and again in future.
I hope he leaves English football. Would hate to see him at a rival but would never support him here at City. Those that would still have him here are the same types who occupy RAWK with excuses and blind loyalty. Grow a pair and see that no one individual is that important that they should be allowed to repeatedly get away with criminal behaviour. Any other profession he would have been deregistered and prevented from practicing ever again for any one of the incidents.
Neville Kneville said:People who would accept Suarez at City, have no respect for the club imo.
They just want results & trophies & don't care how that is achieved, the reputation of the club means nothing.
Or is that "ate" the ragsBones_92 said:Suarez, best striker in the prem and proven. Also hate the rags.
Neville Kneville said:People who would accept Suarez at City, have no respect for the club imo.
They just want results & trophies & don't care how that is achieved, the reputation of the club means nothing.
That's how the rags think.
Cheat, bite, scratch, kick & sing "We do what we want ".
Signing Suarez would imo turn City into a mirror image of the rags. In fact we would be more detestable than them.
Some don't care about that but I do. I'm not supporting a team with him in it & I don't want to sit with people who will sing his name, I'm not going to do it, end of.
if you want to be a top club you have to sign players that will fight for trophies and will make us better, and suarez would improve us a lot imo, the reason we didnt win the league this year is because we didnt sign van persie and just let united take him.Bazzmand Show said:Neville Kneville said:People who would accept Suarez at City, have no respect for the club imo.
They just want results & trophies & don't care how that is achieved, the reputation of the club means nothing.
Agree 100%. Just like I didn't want us to sign Van Persie for the above reasons, Suarez is also a no go imo.
Neville Kneville said:People who would accept Suarez at City, have no respect for the club imo.
They just want results & trophies & don't care how that is achieved, the reputation of the club means nothing.
That's how the rags think.
Cheat, bite, scratch, kick & sing "We do what we want ".
Signing Suarez would imo turn City into a mirror image of the rags. In fact we would be more detestable than them.
Some don't care about that but I do. I'm not supporting a team with him in it & I don't want to sit with people who will sing his name, I'm not going to do it, end of.