FIFA to investigate City over relationship with Danish club?

[canyerdogputoutafire]

Is this the match day forum? I am in derby mood. Come on City.

 

[BLUE THUNDER]

Oh well, they cant handle our success, plays to their insecurities.
Let them try and punish us for hot air, see how that goes.
Pathetic, all they have left are cheap barbs with no substance, as we become everything the other clubs dream about. On and off the pitch.

 

[mccity]

Does it not feel anticlimactic that after everything spouted this week, the one and only thing that's actually being investigated is a footnote that almost everybody missed and almost nobody actually cared about?

 

[mad4city]

Does it not feel anticlimactic that after everything spouted this week, the one and only thing that's actually being investigated is a footnote that almost everybody missed and almost nobody actually cared about?

It's called 'throwing a bone'.
We're safe as houses. Them that are in charge have seen what coincidentally happened to them that crossed us before.

 

[burning blue soul]

It's called 'throwing a bone'.
We're safe as houses. Them that are in charge have seen what coincidentally happened to them that crossed us before.

its very true, that.
uefa reneged on a deal and we saw to it that the whole senior management were cleared out.
looks like fifa are just paying lip service to the hoards of idiotic sheep and are carrying out an "investigation" on nothing, because they know nothing will be found, and therefore the whole sorry saga will die a death, and more importantly, the senior management of uefa and fifa get to keep their jobs and perks for a little while longer.
the whole charade of uefa, fifa, fa and epl are fucking laughable.

 

[laserblue]

I knew City signing all those African players from Denmark would come back to bite us one day. Oh wait...

 

[Ric]

Here is the link to the original Politiken article:

https://politiken.dk/sport/fodbold/art6830967/Manchester-City-can-cherry-pick-African-talents-at-Danish-top-flight-club-–-for-free


A good way down is an extract from the contract:

3.1 is subject to clause 3.5 but they don't show clause 3.5. I wonder why?

3.4 mentions "subject always to the regulations of FIFA and football authorities"

I suspect this is again complete bollocks. I can't imagine in 2016 City would fall foul of the regulations here.

Yeah, I’d be very surprised if we’ve broken any rules with this. It would be pretty calamitous from City if the contract wasn’t watertight.

 

[BlueDejong]

 

[Blue Mist]

Really starting to do my nut in now all this ‘city have done this city have done that’ bollocks.

It’s high time the club whipped out its cosh and cracked a few fucking skulls.

They might be but who would report it? other than to slag us off "bully boys City are worse than Trump in the way they handle a free press'. I used to get wound up and then I realised I was playing the short game, one or two years or whatever whereas our owners are playing the long game, 20 years plus. If they bar reporters it will be turned against us, if we fight back it will be used as a stick to beat us so lets just enjoy the fotall, laugh at the rags n dippers and like our owners, have patience. Remember the long game.

 

[crazyg]

RAWK are in meltdown over this.

They thought Liverpool had the contract for the slave trade.