fit as...city fans

[XxRachXx]

Jesus

How photoshopped aye :P its alright them plastered in makeup but without it well thats a different matter ;)

Meowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Just truthful :) i can accept beauty when its real

 

[jimharri]

Wowser.

The top was has 'thomas cook' spelt backwards like an ambulance. Cool.

I'll assume you're on some sort of festive Clarkie mission.

 

[Ducado]

How photoshopped aye :P its alright them plastered in makeup but without it well thats a different matter ;)

Meowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Be lucky if any of them are barely 16 and I'm being generous

Actually you make a good point there

 

[SWP's back]

How photoshopped aye :P its alright them plastered in makeup but without it well thats a different matter ;)

Meowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Be lucky if any of them are barely 16 and I'm being generous

Not a chance any of them are anywhere near under 16.

 

[bobmcfc]

Meowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Be lucky if any of them are barely 16 and I'm being generous

Not a chance any of them are anywhere near under 16.

I disagree with you on this, and even 16 is abit icky.

If I was a mod I'd go grim reaper on this thread and butcher it with my scythe ;)

 

[SWP's back]

Be lucky if any of them are barely 16 and I'm being generous

Not a chance any of them are anywhere near under 16.

I disagree with you on this, and even 16 is abit icky

Which ones?

The first has a body piercing (have to be over 16)

The 2nd you can only see an arse.

The 3rd looks well old enough to buy booze to me. (just had a pm from someone saying she is 19 and is a sc holder - yey)

The 4th is just a body.

The 5th has a tat (again 18 minimum)

The last one looks older than me.

They are all from facebook and they appear fine with them.

Your bit about being a mod smacks of more "meow-ie-ness" to me.

 

[pirate]

Be lucky if any of them are barely 16 and I'm being generous

Not a chance any of them are anywhere near under 16.

I disagree with you on this, and even 16 is abit icky.

If I was a mod I'd go grim reaper on this thread and butcher it with my scythe ;)

depends how old you are.
16 is a bit icky for me, but for a 16 year old (or 17 or 18) it would be fair enough

 

[bobmcfc]

Not a chance any of them are anywhere near under 16.

I disagree with you on this, and even 16 is abit icky

Which ones?

The first has a body piercing (have to be over 16)

The 2nd you can only see an arse.

The 3rd looks well old enough to buy booze to me.

The 4th is just a body.

The 5th has a tat (again 18 minimum)

The last one looks older than me.

They are all from facebook and they appear fine with them.

Your bit about being a mod smacks of more "meow-ie-ness" to me.

my neice had a belly piercing at 14 and I know plenty of kids in school with tattoos because the 15 year old girls I used to teach would show theirs off regularly lol

 

[SWP's back]

my neice had a belly piercing at 14 and I know plenty of kids in school with tattoos because the 15 year old girls I used to teach would show theirs off regularly lol

I still disagree wholeheartedly. I wouldn't put any of them under 18, never mind 16.

 

[bobmcfc]

my neice had a belly piercing at 14 and I know plenty of kids in school with tattoos because the 15 year old girls I used to teach would show theirs off regularly lol

I still disagree wholeheartedly. I wouldn't put any of them under 18, never mind 16.

They look older with make up but you would be surprised. I would say the blond in the suspenders is over 18, not the rest though