TonyColemansbagofapples
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Sep 2017
- Messages
- 4,074
Was the premier league statement on Arsenal headed notepaper?
I think the PL will get their way. The average time for a bill to pass is 6 months.
A general election in that time will kill it. Labour will say it's not a priority as Starmer is a tarquin and the Tories will shrug and say we tried.
Referees don’t tell the truth.Will the independent regulators have to declare which team they support, like referees have to? :)
We'll see if it's a priority when they come into power.Labour are in favour of it and will carry it forward
I csatn' find a more recent graphic, I think ours is under 100m now, but I think he's just chatting shit.Just read what Sullivan (whu) said
View attachment 110923
Does that mean that utd have over half the pl clubs debt ? Lol. How is that allowed ?
I believe that there is an informal cross-party group of MPs who see City's owner vey much as the model to be copied by other clubs and cannot see why "other clubs" are allowed to frustrate us and try to destroy what is being built.That's how I see it. Especially about the govn wanting investment. I imagine they look at the product and see it being throttled by utd and lfc.
Surely Nottingham Forest should be at the top of the list! Aren't City debt free?I csatn' find a more recent graphic, I think ours is under 100m now, but I think he's just chatting shit.
The PL has loads of debt and it's never been a problem to stop them spending.
View attachment 110932
Aren't Spuds in over £1bn of manageable debt too?The West Ham porn king quoted: “there’s no spare cash as the clubs are £2 billion in debt”
So that means that just one club is in effect carrying half of the whole debt of the entire division.
Nothing to see here - move along.
Pretty much. I just read all the news articles about this big announcement looking for detail. This is the extent of it.Loads of words without any substance.
Ok...so part 1 already exists. Part 2 will be "Is your money illegal?" and Part 3 is "Have you got a plan?"On the test applied to owners and directors, the regulator will look to work in three stages. The first will be a traditional assessment of “integrity, honesty [and] financial soundness”, with directors also expected to prove their competency.
The second stage will allow for “enhanced due diligence” of the source of a potential owner’s money to stop the use of “illicit” money to buy stakes in clubs.
The third stage would require the submission of a business plan that lays out how an owner would seek to run their club sustainably.
Ah Ok, so that's completely meaningless.On fan engagement and club heritage, clubs will be required to consult with fans on a regular basis, but not obliged to act on their concerns.
Much of the specifics of the regulator’s targets and criteria remain to be determined, including the crucial measures, such as cost controls, by which clubs would be expected to ensure their financial sustainability.
The incessant barage of Gambling adverts and sponsorship is one of the most common complaints you will hear from football fans, who are sick of seeing 10 betting adverts every half time, pitch hoardings flashing up black market chinese betting firms and every podcast selling out to them as well. Not to mention every other shop on the high street is a bookies.“I’ve always felt it’s a little like the gambling act of 2005 when they set up the gambling commission: it sets out the principles under which the regulator will operate but gives the regulator quite a lot of scope and discussion to make some detailed decisions,”