Froch Vs Groves

Blumers Bloomers said:
Wretched Vengeance said:
Booth commiserating with Groves. Nice to see. Would be interesting to know why they split mind.

All look genuinely devastated. Unsurprising really.

I am genuinely upset for the lad. I think that was Groves' and his missus and they both looked terribly upset.

Froch appeared to have a problem with his mouth; I do hope it's broken, but sadly it did not stop him from spewing shite at the end.
 
paul-dkn said:
markyboyblue said:
Do they not do standing counts any more? If they do the ref should have just given Groves a standing count then realised he was ok to carry on. He was totally with it when the ref was stopping it.

You're right. If groves had gone down (as froch did in the 1st), or taken a knee he would of had a standing 8 count then been back in the fight.
Yep, Groves was perhaps a little bit naive in not doing this, although he had given so much by this time, and was probably not thinking too clearly.
 
ManCitizens. said:
softlad said:
ManCitizens. said:
People paying in the first place are mugs, just like the people paying for SS1/ BT Sport etc.

Not sure you can say they or we are mugs. Without the payers there wouldn't be a decent stream.

If people don't buy the product it would be lowered until people do.
I wouldn't pay 10p to watch the rematch its getting like the wwe its all scripted.its laughable.i for one won't be watching
 
paul-dkn said:
markyboyblue said:
Do they not do standing counts any more? If they do the ref should have just given Groves a standing count then realised he was ok to carry on. He was totally with it when the ref was stopping it.

You're right. If groves had gone down (as froch did in the 1st), or taken a knee he would of had a standing 8 count then been back in the fight.

Well he's not right because they don't do standing counts in professional boxing.

If he'd gone down on a knee it would have been a knockdown not a standing count and cost him a point.
 
simon31goat said:
ManCitizens. said:
softlad said:
Not sure you can say they or we are mugs. Without the payers there wouldn't be a decent stream.

If people don't buy the product it would be lowered until people do.
I wouldn't pay 10p to watch the rematch its getting like the wwe its all scripted.its laughable.i for one won't be watching

Like I said, I hope you don't have a subscription to Sky, BT Sport, Sky Movies or any other TV package.
 
ban-mcfc said:
Grooves in tears.

Fucking shocking. Fuck the money I was cheated out of, Grooves' career has been cheated.


In what way? Do you think he would have won from the point where it was stopped? If anything the ref did Groves a favour in the long run, he won a lot of sympathy and fair few new fans I would say.
I would have loved to have seen Froch finish him off, ah well, roll on the rematch, chance to get your money back.
 
nw42 said:
ban-mcfc said:
Grooves in tears.

Fucking shocking. Fuck the money I was cheated out of, Grooves' career has been cheated.


In what way? Do you think he would have won from the point where it was stopped? If anything the ref did Groves a favour in the long run, he won a lot of sympathy and fair few new fans I would say.
I would have loved to have seen Froch finish him off, ah well, roll on the rematch, chance to get your money back.

I'm not convinced Froch would have won from that point.
 
ManCitizens. said:
simon31goat said:
ManCitizens. said:
If people don't buy the product it would be lowered until people do.
I wouldn't pay 10p to watch the rematch its getting like the wwe its all scripted.its laughable.i for one won't be watching

Like I said, I hope you don't have a subscription to Sky, BT Sport, Sky Movies or any other TV package.


If you want to complain about subscriptions, why not start another thread about it. I am happy with what I pay.

Currently I am paying and sat up watching England get humped at cricket.:(
 
Wretched Vengeance said:
ManCitizens. said:
simon31goat said:
I wouldn't pay 10p to watch the rematch its getting like the wwe its all scripted.its laughable.i for one won't be watching

Like I said, I hope you don't have a subscription to Sky, BT Sport, Sky Movies or any other TV package.


If you want to complain about subscriptions, why not start another thread about it. I am happy with what I pay.

Currently I am paying and sat up watching England get humped at cricket.:(

You're missing my point. I'm only saying this because Simongoat is making a big deal about Sky making £££££ from this fight.
 
ManCitizens. said:
Wretched Vengeance said:
ManCitizens. said:
Like I said, I hope you don't have a subscription to Sky, BT Sport, Sky Movies or any other TV package.


If you want to complain about subscriptions, why not start another thread about it. I am happy with what I pay.

Currently I am paying and sat up watching England get humped at cricket.:(

You're missing my point. I'm only saying this because Simongoat is making a big deal about Sky making £££££ from this fight.


Sorry Blue, my fault. I'll probably end up paying for that fucker too.
 
Wretched Vengeance said:
ManCitizens. said:
Wretched Vengeance said:
If you want to complain about subscriptions, why not start another thread about it. I am happy with what I pay.

Currently I am paying and sat up watching England get humped at cricket.:(

You're missing my point. I'm only saying this because Simongoat is making a big deal about Sky making £££££ from this fight.


Sorry Blue, my fault. I'll probably end up paying for that fucker too.

On the plus side, it looks like you can have an early night tomorrow as they'll be no cricket on.
 
johnmc said:
nw42 said:
ban-mcfc said:
Grooves in tears.

Fucking shocking. Fuck the money I was cheated out of, Grooves' career has been cheated.


In what way? Do you think he would have won from the point where it was stopped? If anything the ref did Groves a favour in the long run, he won a lot of sympathy and fair few new fans I would say.
I would have loved to have seen Froch finish him off, ah well, roll on the rematch, chance to get your money back.

I'm not convinced Froch would have won from that point.

Well we'll never know but I thought he'd taken everything Groves could throw (which was a hell of a lot) and was in the ascendancy.
Either way it was a great battle and the rematch will sell out whatever venue they decide on, not that I'll be shelling out mind.
 
ManCitizens. said:
Wretched Vengeance said:
ManCitizens. said:
You're missing my point. I'm only saying this because Simongoat is making a big deal about Sky making £££££ from this fight.

That and I will be at work for 0 8 wheel wagons ....08:00


Sorry Blue, my fault. I'll probably end up paying for that fucker too.

On the plus side, it looks like you can have an early night tomorrow as they'll be no cricket on.
<br /><br />-- Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:42 am --<br /><br />
Wretched Vengeance said:
ManCitizens. said:
Wretched Vengeance said:
That and I will be at work for 0 8 wheel wagons ....08:00


Sorry Blue, my fault. I'll probably end up paying for that fucker too.

On the plus side, it looks like you can have an early night tomorrow as they'll be no cricket on.


That and I will be at work for 0 8 wheel wagons: 08:00
 
My mate who went to the match, said it was kicking off all over afterwards, bottles getting thrown about and his lass got hit by one.
 
nw42 said:
ban-mcfc said:
Grooves in tears.

Fucking shocking. Fuck the money I was cheated out of, Grooves' career has been cheated.


In what way? Do you think he would have won from the point where it was stopped? If anything the ref did Groves a favour in the long run, he won a lot of sympathy and fair few new fans I would say.
I would have loved to have seen Froch finish him off, ah well, roll on the rematch, chance to get your money back.

He was bossing the fight, he was well ahead and it was the first time he looked shaky. He had Froch in the same position several times.
 
allan harper said:
My mate who went to the match, said it was kicking off all over afterwards, bottles getting thrown about and his lass got hit by one.

It seemed like it was kicking during the fight, people at ringside looking behind all the time, bang out of order throwing stuff around indiscriminately, hope your mates doris is ok. I bet town's lively now.
 
nw42 said:
allan harper said:
My mate who went to the match, said it was kicking off all over afterwards, bottles getting thrown about and his lass got hit by one.

It seemed like it was kicking during the fight, people at ringside looking behind all the time, bang out of order throwing stuff around indiscriminately, hope your mates doris is ok. I bet town's lively now.

It's shocking really that people decide to act like this.
 
ban-mcfc said:
nw42 said:
ban-mcfc said:
Grooves in tears.

Fucking shocking. Fuck the money I was cheated out of, Grooves' career has been cheated.


In what way? Do you think he would have won from the point where it was stopped? If anything the ref did Groves a favour in the long run, he won a lot of sympathy and fair few new fans I would say.
I would have loved to have seen Froch finish him off, ah well, roll on the rematch, chance to get your money back.

He was bossing the fight, he was well ahead and it was the first time he looked shaky. He had Froch in the same position several times.

He had been bossing the fight but he wasn't at the time, surely you could see it was turning in favour of Froch, it needed something special from Froch to win it but imo it was coming. The ref ruined it no mistake but I still think Groves will benefit from that terrible decision in the long run.
 
Gutted for groves, I think he would of survived the round and lost on those dodgy judges score cards but deserved the win. That's my opinion. Sure some people think froch was getting the upper hand and would of won on stoppage soon after the actual stoppge, but defo ref stopped it too soon and now we'll never know, didn't pay for it and won't pay for the rematch but will watch it thanks to shady the legend
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top