I like him and his analysis.
He's generally extremely respectful over the achievements of this squad in the last 7 years and he always stresses how incredible it is to keep going again and again and again like we have been doing. That's a point that is not made anywhere near enough. We've made winning the league every year to be normal rather than novel, and its something that he brings up when others fail to.
He's a rag obviously but as far as rags go, I can stomach him. He also seems to not take the banter too seriously which is nice compared to someone like a Keane who "rages" at "disrespectful" fans.
You have to remember that the job of a broadcaster is primarily to be entertaining or engaging in some manner. Neville like the rest of them including Richards, phrase things in such a way to create engagement. Look at Daniel Sturridge - the most pointless and useless analyst in the history of televised sport who never met a cliche he understood, yet his stupid singing and "bantz" has probably got 5 million views on TikTok or Youtube.
I think of pundits on a sliding scale between pure entertainers like Sturridge and the latest kid grabbed from online content creators, to serious and rather dry football analysts. Neville is on the right side of that line, he's smarter than Carragher (a fine achievement) and sounds like someone who has actually thought about what is in front of him. He's wrong a lot about what was in front of him, obviously, but it's nice that he tries.