Gary Neville

bridgeno1 said:
So this is interesting as on another forum I'm on its basically primarily Liverpool fans saying that City are a small club and had no real success before the takeover blah blah blah.

I'm not here to argue that one way or the other but what I would like to know is do you even care? Surely what matters is recent history, not something that happened ages ago right? Would you swap your 4 in a row and the treble to be 'as big as' Manchester United? Surely you wouldn't right? I mean Siberia is a bigger place than Thailand but I know where I'd rather retire!
Click to expand...
No need to argue it my friend, our previous history speaks for itself, trouble is, people who spout this shite have no clue about our clubs history, before our beloved Sheik took the reins ..
 
Stiff Little Wingers said:
It’s all a load of shit this “big club” business. Created by Rags and dippers and their compliant media.The Arse, dippers and rags are the biggest clubs in England against a number of variables.
Below them are the next tier of City, Spurs, Villa, Everton and possibly Newcastle and Chelsea. All very big clubs and always will be but fortunes will change from era to era.
Click to expand...
Chelsea are bigger than Everton and certainly Villa
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
The debate surrounding how big clubs are is so tedious. It’s subjective and also irrelevant.

You could even frame it that the entitlement of a club’s fanbase is directly proportionate to the club’s size.
Click to expand...
The subject is only partially relevant within Era's, Generations & in context.

City's size, history and success is beyond doubt.....the 'biggest' club in Manchester for many,many years

Trophies before the rags, dippers,everton chelsea,vanilla, spuds.

The rags would be nowt without City's benevolence, the air crash and sky tv.
 
Keep it up boys and girls! The hatred for this loathsome piece of turd is keeping a smile on my face. CTWD
 
Gone for a Burton said:
The subject is only partially relevant within Era's, Generations & in context.

City's size, history and success is beyond doubt.....the 'biggest' club in Manchester for many,many years

Trophies before the rags, dippers,everton chelsea,vanilla, spuds.

The rags would be nowt without City's benevolence, the air crash and sky tv.
Click to expand...
Relevant to what? What is the point in comparing any club’s size? What does it achieve?
 
Irrelevant rag ****.

In every metric we are bigger than Spurs; trophies, fans, turnover, star names, manager, owner wealth, commercial income.

The only thing they have more of is number of dickheads in their fanbase.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top