Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,373
The kid referred to genetics and culture and the when summing up he only said "culturally similar". Why did he do that? Genetics are an irrelevance to the point about culture he was making if it's only taken at face value.
What other reason could there be for including genetics and then excluding it other than dog whistling?
Isn't it intellectually dishonest to not know who the guests or the host are and think that your opinion is worth taking seriously? That your assessment of an interview when you are deliberately ignorant is of any value?
What other reason could there be for including genetics and then excluding it other than dog whistling?
Isn't it intellectually dishonest to not know who the guests or the host are and think that your opinion is worth taking seriously? That your assessment of an interview when you are deliberately ignorant is of any value?
Last edited: