You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
George Floyd murder / Derek Chauvin guilty of murder
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
Scottyboi
Well-Known Member
Talking of compliance....
Wtf is that about, honestly the man was ready to be arrested peacefully and that weak **** couldn't even drop him with an unprovoked kick.
Silva_Spell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 5,287
There is nothing you're ever "objective" about.
Whoever makes a judgment call on an individual snap of action without seeing the full context is not "objective" and cannot be.
Don't use words you don't or cannot understand.
Should be easy then to show me where I have done that.
Silva_Spell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 5,287
Yes, but... but... but he 'resisted' and that's the key part, right @Dax777 and co?
He's lucky he didn't eat another 7 bullets to go with his brunch! He would have deserved that!
Yea, this is exactly like the Blake case smh
Bigga
Well-Known Member
Should be easy then to show me where I have done that.
You can choose most of any video clips you yourself have posted, along with the judgements you have cast based upon the clip, rather than what happened before, what's with the person etc.
That's anything BUT "objective" as being so would factor in anything else, leaving room for more information to be cited or to be 'wrong'.
Which you never seem to be about any of your 'judgements'.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
Yea, this is exactly like the Blake case smh
If the man ends up 'fighting back', is he "resisting arrest" or not?
Remember, I'm using YOUR OWN definitions of "resisting arrest" as you've set out earlier in the thread.
Silva_Spell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 5,287
You can choose most of any video clips you yourself have posted, along with the judgements you have cast based upon the clip, rather than what happened before, what's with the person etc.
That's anything BUT "objective" as being so would factor in anything else, leaving room for more information to be cited or to be 'wrong'.
Which you never seem to be about any of your 'judgements'.
I don't recall posting any video
If you're referring to the Rittenhouse video, I made clear that I was basing any judgement on the video and the video alone, a video people were bizarrely claiming was a murder.
Silva_Spell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 5,287
If the man ends up 'fighting back', is he "resisting arrest" or not?
Remember, I'm using YOUR OWN definitions of "resisting arrest" as you've set out earlier in the thread.
Blake wasn't even shot for resisting arrest.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
I don't recall posting any video
If you're referring to the Rittenhouse video, I made clear that I was basing any judgement on the video and the video alone, a video people were bizarrely claiming was a murder.
So, do you think it would stupid to base a judgement off an isolated video?
If you turned a corner and saw a bunch of guys kicking the shit out of some dude on the floor, you'd scream they were out of order, right?
But, let's say you arrived 5 mins earlier to see the same guy that was on the floor attempting a sexual assault on a female who was then chased and had the shit kicked out of him by a bunch of guys, do you think you who would have screamed they were out of order or do you think you had greater context to the situation...?
Take your time, amigo...
Bigga
Well-Known Member
Blake wasn't even shot for resisting arrest.
Okay, let's play your game.
At any point, according to your definition, did Blake 'resist arrest' or not?