MaineDAWG2008 said:Yes it was. Galloway however, remains a detestable fucking turd and he's still a fucking hypocrite. He sucked the arse of a man who murdered millions of his own people, made millions more refugees and maimed and tortured tens of thousands.
After his defence of Saddam, he can claim no moral high ground where Israel is concerned.
Really now? So who do you think sucked the ass of Osama bin laden before he went against the west?
Where do u think the Taliban got its funds and weapons from? Or do u think they invested in stocks to make money so that they can wage a war with the west??
Please people.... do your research before posting dumbfounded posts without the research.
MaineDAWG2008 said:Yes it was. Galloway however, remains a detestable fucking turd and he's still a fucking hypocrite. He sucked the arse of a man who murdered millions of his own people, made millions more refugees and maimed and tortured tens of thousands.
After his defence of Saddam, he can claim no moral high ground where Israel is concerned.
Really now? So who do you think sucked the ass of Osama bin laden before he went against the west?
Where do u think the Taliban got its funds and weapons from? Or do u think they invested in stocks to make money so that they can wage a war with the west??
Please people.... do your research before posting dumbfounded posts without the research.
Skashion said:Let George himself take this one, RFK:stony said:Yes it was. Galloway however, remains a detestable fucking turd and he's still a fucking hypocrite. He sucked the arse of a man who murdered millions of his own people, made millions more refugees and maimed and tortured tens of thousands.
After his defence of Saddam, he can claim no moral high ground where Israel is concerned.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5IMg6KHTUk[/video]
stony said:MaineDAWG2008 said:and other powerful leaders have never met dictators before in the past.
Let us see....
Blair and Gaddaffi?
Obama and Gadaffi?
Rumsfield and Sadam Hussein?
The list is endless....These dictators were once funded by our tax monies but end up on the wrong side after we in the west set them up. So why are we pointing out Galloway's meeting with Hussein?
some of the posters here u'd think would have more sense but end up sounding like the sun readers.
Saruman and Gandalf ?
Oh do shut up you patronising c**t. Of course politicians meet people who aren't very nice, and they have to be nice to them to get what their country wants. They don't have to suck up the way Galloway did. He went beyond nice, he toadied and it was sickening to see.
Rocket-footed kolarov said:Skashion said:Let George himself take this one, RFK:stony said:Yes it was. Galloway however, remains a detestable fucking turd and he's still a fucking hypocrite. He sucked the arse of a man who murdered millions of his own people, made millions more refugees and maimed and tortured tens of thousands.
After his defence of Saddam, he can claim no moral high ground where Israel is concerned.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5IMg6KHTUk[/video]
Was thinking of that exact vid, as it has been posted countless times before.
stony said:MaineDAWG2008 said:and other powerful leaders have never met dictators before in the past.
Let us see....
Blair and Gaddaffi?
Obama and Gadaffi?
Rumsfield and Sadam Hussein?
The list is endless....These dictators were once funded by our tax monies but end up on the wrong side after we in the west set them up. So why are we pointing out Galloway's meeting with Hussein?
some of the posters here u'd think would have more sense but end up sounding like the sun readers.
Saruman and Gandalf ?
Oh do shut up you patronising c**t. Of course politicians meet people who aren't very nice, and they have to be nice to them to get what their country wants. They don't have to suck up the way Galloway did. He went beyond nice, he toadied and it was sickening to see.
Do you think there is a reason why the Galloway might have had to suck up more than a diplomat or man of government might? All George Galloway had was a bit of kiss arse and perceived political capital i.e. that he might offer the regime some political support from the west. He certainly wasn't sincere about what he said and maybe he did it to appease Saddam in the hope that he would be more likely achieve the purpose of his visit (to get the weapons inspectors allowed back in) if he turned the brown-nosing up to 11.
You don't like Galloway because he is smarmy prick,and that is fair enough, just be honest about it rather than drag up those tired old myths that we see in every GG thread.
stony said:Rocket-footed kolarov said:Skashion said:Let George himself take this one, RFK:
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5IMg6KHTUk[/video]
Was thinking of that exact vid, as it has been posted countless times before.
stony said:Saruman and Gandalf ?
Oh do shut up you patronising c**t. Of course politicians meet people who aren't very nice, and they have to be nice to them to get what their country wants. They don't have to suck up the way Galloway did. He went beyond nice, he toadied and it was sickening to see.
Do you think there is a reason why the Galloway might have had to suck up more than a diplomat or man of government might? All George Galloway had was a bit of kiss arse and perceived political capital i.e. that he might offer the regime some political support from the west. He certainly wasn't sincere about what he said and maybe he did it to appease Saddam in the hope that he would be more likely achieve the purpose of his visit (to get the weapons inspectors allowed back in) if he turned the brown-nosing up to 11.
You don't like Galloway because he is smarmy prick,and that is fair enough, just be honest about it rather than drag up those tired old myths that we see in every GG thread.
You're a cheeky twat. I dislike Galloway not because he's a smarmy c**t, but because like 99% of politicians he's a lying c**t. I don't think he has an honest bone in his body. Nothing to do with being smarmy, everything to do with being a manipulative, lying, toadying, bare faced c**t.
My biggest gripe with Galloway is that he masquerades as a man of principles, a man of honour when nothing could be further from the truth. He's every bit as greedy as the rest of the pigs with their noses in the parliamentary trough, and as hungry for fame as every other big brother/xfactor/ice dancing fucking arse grape.
He's a contemptible slug, but the man who smacked him is an obvious arsehole and I hope he faces the full force of the law.
I don't however feel any sympathy for Galloway. Fuck him and the gravy train he rode in on.
Kazzydeyna said:The state of Israel, specifically her government, has committed atrocities and genocide and continues to do so.
One day, I know not when, but one day, the state of Israel will be punished and punished severely, and her leaders tried and convicted of mass murder. I hope and pray I live to see such a day.
The state of Israel was founded and in later years (to this day) supported ,in part, out of white European Christian guilt for the crimes perpetrated by white European Christians on mainly white European Jews. That the outcome of such guilt was to punish brown skinned, Arab Muslims by stealing their lands, their orchards, their farms, their homes and their future is a stain upon humanity, and one for which those poor unfortunate Arabs and their descendants are still paying.
OK. I think you need a cup of sweet tea and a biccy, everything will feel calmer then.stony said:Rocket-footed kolarov said:Skashion said:Let George himself take this one, RFK:
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5IMg6KHTUk[/video]
Was thinking of that exact vid, as it has been posted countless times before.
stony said:Saruman and Gandalf ?
Oh do shut up you patronising c**t. Of course politicians meet people who aren't very nice, and they have to be nice to them to get what their country wants. They don't have to suck up the way Galloway did. He went beyond nice, he toadied and it was sickening to see.
Do you think there is a reason why the Galloway might have had to suck up more than a diplomat or man of government might? All George Galloway had was a bit of kiss arse and perceived political capital i.e. that he might offer the regime some political support from the west. He certainly wasn't sincere about what he said and maybe he did it to appease Saddam in the hope that he would be more likely achieve the purpose of his visit (to get the weapons inspectors allowed back in) if he turned the brown-nosing up to 11.
You don't like Galloway because he is smarmy prick,and that is fair enough, just be honest about it rather than drag up those tired old myths that we see in every GG thread.
You're a cheeky twat. I dislike Galloway not because he's a smarmy c**t, but because like 99% of politicians he's a lying c**t. I don't think he has an honest bone in his body. Nothing to do with being smarmy, everything to do with being a manipulative, lying, toadying, bare faced c**t.
My biggest gripe with Galloway is that he masquerades as a man of principles, a man of honour when nothing could be further from the truth. He's every bit as greedy as the rest of the pigs with their noses in the parliamentary trough, and as hungry for fame as every other big brother/xfactor/ice dancing fucking arse grape.
He's a contemptible slug, but the man who smacked him is an obvious arsehole and I hope he faces the full force of the law.
I don't however feel any sympathy for Galloway. Fuck him and the gravy train he rode in on.
stony said:Rocket-footed kolarov said:Skashion said:Let George himself take this one, RFK:
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5IMg6KHTUk[/video]
Was thinking of that exact vid, as it has been posted countless times before.
stony said:Saruman and Gandalf ?
Oh do shut up you patronising c**t. Of course politicians meet people who aren't very nice, and they have to be nice to them to get what their country wants. They don't have to suck up the way Galloway did. He went beyond nice, he toadied and it was sickening to see.
Do you think there is a reason why the Galloway might have had to suck up more than a diplomat or man of government might? All George Galloway had was a bit of kiss arse and perceived political capital i.e. that he might offer the regime some political support from the west. He certainly wasn't sincere about what he said and maybe he did it to appease Saddam in the hope that he would be more likely achieve the purpose of his visit (to get the weapons inspectors allowed back in) if he turned the brown-nosing up to 11.
You don't like Galloway because he is smarmy prick,and that is fair enough, just be honest about it rather than drag up those tired old myths that we see in every GG thread.
You're a cheeky twat. I dislike Galloway not because he's a smarmy c**t, but because like 99% of politicians he's a lying c**t. I don't think he has an honest bone in his body. Nothing to do with being smarmy, everything to do with being a manipulative, lying, toadying, bare faced c**t.
My biggest gripe with Galloway is that he masquerades as a man of principles, a man of honour when nothing could be further from the truth. He's every bit as greedy as the rest of the pigs with their noses in the parliamentary trough, and as hungry for fame as every other big brother/xfactor/ice dancing fucking arse grape.
He's a contemptible slug, but the man who smacked him is an obvious arsehole and I hope he faces the full force of the law.
I don't however feel any sympathy for Galloway. Fuck him and the gravy train he rode in on.
Markt85 said:stony said:Rocket-footed kolarov said:Was thinking of that exact vid, as it has been posted countless times before.
Do you think there is a reason why the Galloway might have had to suck up more than a diplomat or man of government might? All George Galloway had was a bit of kiss arse and perceived political capital i.e. that he might offer the regime some political support from the west. He certainly wasn't sincere about what he said and maybe he did it to appease Saddam in the hope that he would be more likely achieve the purpose of his visit (to get the weapons inspectors allowed back in) if he turned the brown-nosing up to 11.
You don't like Galloway because he is smarmy prick,and that is fair enough, just be honest about it rather than drag up those tired old myths that we see in every GG thread.
You're a cheeky twat. I dislike Galloway not because he's a smarmy c**t, but because like 99% of politicians he's a lying c**t. I don't think he has an honest bone in his body. Nothing to do with being smarmy, everything to do with being a manipulative, lying, toadying, bare faced c**t.
My biggest gripe with Galloway is that he masquerades as a man of principles, a man of honour when nothing could be further from the truth. He's every bit as greedy as the rest of the pigs with their noses in the parliamentary trough, and as hungry for fame as every other big brother/xfactor/ice dancing fucking arse grape.
He's a contemptible slug, but the man who smacked him is an obvious arsehole and I hope he faces the full force of the law.
I don't however feel any sympathy for Galloway. Fuck him and the gravy train he rode in on.
''Hes a lying c*nt'' - can you give a few examples ?