Good riddance

What actually happens if Robinho flatly refuses to come back...Do City have any say on the matter and can we fuck him big time if it comes to it. ??
 
Bonol said:
I would of sat the twat in the stand for the rest of the season and fucked his world cup chance up, problem is that would be doing Brazil a favour. Robinho was not good enough at R Madrid and not good enough for us, we can't all be wrong. I knew this would happen, its all you can do when your found out, blame every fucker but yourself.
Click to expand...

That could very well happen - he has had two dissapointing stints at European clubs and no matter how well he plays in Brazil there will always be a question mark over his ability to perform for the very very top European clubs whom he aspires to play for.

His style of play is more suited to La Liga / Seria A but he could not command a place a RM even before the superstars arrived so no chance now.

City aint going to let him go on the cheap maybe 20 Million is all we could hope for with add ons but his wages are deffo going to take a hike. If he wants to stay in Brazil then good no issue for me but he is going to have to play out of his skin for Santo to cough up both the Transfer and Wages which they cant afford - so summer should be interesting time

Personally i want him to shut the fook up play out of his skin and we recoup all of our monies and then i would be happy
 
we will see how much he likes it when he gets kidnapped fooking lawless place brazil.
pidgeon hearted twat never suited to rolling sleeves up def to go to italy I think he will get away with doing fook all cannot see santos paying for him long term.
How funny if we brought him back to play with the reserves just to teach the twat a lesson cos to the owners money is nothing.
 
samharris said:
What actually happens if Robinho flatly refuses to come back...Do City have any say on the matter and can we fuck him big time if it comes to it. ??
Click to expand...

I think we have to look at this from the perspective of Manchester City rather than that adopted by Robinho.

To start with, I don't think there is actually a precedent for this. Then again, I'm not as young as I was and possibly others might beg to differ.

From our perspective, the club has to make a decision (I'm pretty sure a decision will have been made) as to what legal action it will pursue if it wants to allege a break of contract by the Brazilian, taking into account whatever agreement was signed with Santos in connexion with his temporary loan transfer till the end of the season.

As has already been stated earlier in this thread, he is a Manchester City player. So, by moving to another club - irrespective of where that club is - it doesn't mean that gives him a right to prepare the ground to leave the club he is registered with by selling all his material possessions and stating that he has no desire to return to Manchester City.

The club will now be forced into issuing a statement to the media as to how it intends to react to this report. Remember, it may not be true. Firstly, it will have to state whether they acknowledge that Robinho has confirmed this directly, i.e. he has told the club he is selling up and has no desire or intention of returning. Clearly, if he states that he has no intention of returning, which is almost certainly the case, then he is would normally be in breach of his contract.

So, the choice is :-

1. Pursuing a legal case to recover compensation. Doubtless this would interest and involve FIFA, Eufa and the Premier League. The Mutu case with Chelsea, though different, inasmuch as the club itself sacked the player due to drug abuse and thereby construed that Mutu himself was fully responsible for breaking his contract, has some tangiential considerations.

2. Taking the first acceptable bid from a club which meets our market valuation. This of course is not striaghtforward either. As we know Brazilian clubs are not wealthy and Santos have alrady stated that they cannot afford say €25m. Any club willing to part with the kind of fee that we deem accepatable, not to mention the fact that the club offering the cash will have to measure up to Robinho's lofty and some would say unrealistic expectations, are probably few and far between. Barcelona is one such club, but I rather thought they have subsequently indicated that they ended their interest in him.

Personally, I would opt for the former. It carries a lot of negative publicity risks though. However, I would be prepared to take those risks.
 
Tez Tosterone said:
samharris said:
What actually happens if Robinho flatly refuses to come back...Do City have any say on the matter and can we fuck him big time if it comes to it. ??
Click to expand...

I think we have to look at this from the perspective of Manchester City rather than that adopted by Robinho.

To start with, I don't think there is actually a precedent for this. Then again, I'm not as young as I was and possibly others might beg to differ.

From our perspective, the club has to make a decision (I'm pretty sure a decision will have been made) as to what legal action it will pursue if it wants to allege a break of contract by the Brazilian, taking into account whatever agreement was signed with Santos in connexion with his temporary loan transfer till the end of the season.

As has already been stated earlier in this thread, he is a Manchester City player. So, by moving to another club - irrespective of where that club is - it doesn't mean that gives him a right to prepare the ground to leave the club he is registered with by selling all his material possessions and stating that he has no desire to return to Manchester City.

The club will now be forced into issuing a statement to the media as to how it intends to react to this report. Remember, it may not be true. Firstly, it will have to state whether they acknowledge that Robinho has confirmed this directly, i.e. he has told the club he is selling up and has no desire or intention of returning. Clearly, if he states that he has no intention of returning, which is almost certainly the case, then he is would normally be in breach of his contract.

So, the choice is :-

1. Pursuing a legal case to recover compensation. Doubtless this would interest and involve FIFA, Eufa and the Premier League. The Mutu case with Chelsea, though different, inasmuch as the club itself sacked the player due to drug abuse and thereby construed that Mutu himself was fully responsible for breaking his contract, has some tangiential considerations.

2. Taking the first acceptable bid from a club which meets our market valuation. This of course is not striaghtforward either. As we know Brazilian clubs are not wealthy and Santos have alrady stated that they cannot afford say €25m. Any club willing to part with the kind of fee that we deem accepatable, not to mention the fact that the club offering the cash will have to measure up to Robinho's lofty and some would say unrealistic expectations, are probably few and far between. Barcelona is one such club, but I rather thought they have subsequently indicated that they ended their interest in him.

Personally, I would opt for the former. It carries a lot of negative publicity risks though. However, I would be prepared to take those risks.
Click to expand...


Cheers Bud. :)
 
I have long held the view that Robinho only ever says what he thinks people want to hear. He'll probably tell the Santos crowd how much he loves it there and has no intention of ever returning to City, but tells his employers (us) quite the reverse.

It's going to be interesting to see what comes of it all, but either way he's not going to come out of it smelling of roses, is he?
Once again he's thrown the proverbial toys out of the pram like the spoiled little prima-donna he obviously is. So it's really only a matter of time before he does exactly the same at Santos, then he really will have burned all his bridges.

He can't cut it in Europe, that much is apparent. So for now he's happy to be 'Billy Big-Time' with his cronies in Brazil, but when that inevitably turns sour he'll find his options are extremely limited.


The fundamental questions are: Who would want him? And who could afford him?



That's why I say he's burned his bridges.
 
You can tell he's confident again, that's what having thousands of fans cheering you instead of moaning and groaning at every mistake does to you. That's why he was so good last season when everyone just cheered everything he did but this season it weasn't good enough and was expected to defend when he's an attacker. Any wonder it's not worked out for him?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.