Grammatical question

[crizack]

Smith where Jones had had had had had had had had had had had the approval of the examiners.


Can you make sense of this statement?

 

[Anonymous]

No , not really .. is too hard , innit !

 

[Anonymous]

Yes - I think. It seems to be missing a lot of punctuation and probably refers to an answer to an exam question given by Smith and a slightly different one by Jones with Smith's answer getting the examiners' seal of approval.

 

[speccybob]

He's got a stutter FFS. Tight b-b-b-b-b-bastards

 

[andyhinch]

I'm the man for this, it's bollocks

 

[crizack]

He's got a stutter FFS. Tight b-b-b-b-b-bastards

HAHA!

 

[Blueband Brother]

No, it makes no sense.

 

[speccybob]

No, it makes no sense.

I'm quite shocked that you don't get it then ;)

 

[Paladin]

Smith, where Jones had had 'had', had had 'had had'. 'Had had' had had the approval of the examiners.

Or...

Smith, where Jones had had 'had had', had had 'had'. 'Had had' had had the approval of the examiners.

 

[Ragnarok]

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo