Pep made Jack's dream come true, Jack didn't make Pep's dream come true. Pep had thoughts of creating a world beater out of Jack, that didn't work. In any other profession, the project would be filed under the failed projects column however in football, Fans can rationalise things in their favour.
No fan wants to admit it when their club gets rinsed by another club at the transfer market, It's kind of how Chelsea fans claim that goal Torress scored against Barcelona paid off his transfer fee, we all know that's a ridiculous take, now put yourself in the shoes of a fan from a different club and ask yourself if Jack has been a success here or not. The answer is right in front of you
In a 4 year period in our greatest era, City have won more games when Grealish has played and lost more matches when he hasn't which I think deserves a lot of respect.
It also encompassed winning the treble and 4 in a row. The sheer magnitude of winning 4 league titles in a row for the first time in the history of English football seems to escape many on here, an achievement that will be spoken about in 100 years time yet posters are talking about not making dreams come true FFS.
Professional football is about building a balanced team to win football matches. And that's it.
And yet there's 57 pages in this thread and 488 pages in the other thread of tactical geniuses and transfer gurus endlessly repeating themselves, whilst missing the main fucking point of professional football.
Grealish fitted like hand in glove in an extremely high level team that suffocated the opposition both with and without the ball, death by 1000 cuts football, involving real patience, discipline and precision passing, requiring constant focus and concentration from opponents that couldn't be maintained.So rather than slurs, the only thing completely wasted was this level of football on the many on here stomping their feet and wanting the ball passed forward quicker to Haaland.
But the most analysed and popular sport moves on and it seems a narrower front three, a deeper midfield and getting the ball forward to Haaland is where it's now headed. This is probably due to a large extent in Haaland signing a long new contract. And now the foot stompers are complaining about the inevitable energy required in midfield for the increased number of turnovers.
Jimmy Greaves didn't become a bad player immediately because he couldn't force his way back into the 1966 team after injury where Ramsey liked the balance of the team he'd stumbled upon. Ian Bishop didn't become a bad player because Kendall preferred to play a different way in which Mark Ward was more suited. So I don't think Haaland signing a 9 year contract requires a full complement oi Hello magazine writers to pontificate and it may just be a different tactical approach is the now best option to get a balanced team in order to win professional football matches.
So rather than the armchair experts on here who've no real appreciation of what they've been witnessing over the last few years I'll leave the final word to the Godfather of modern football.
