Guardiola confirms intention to stay at City for next two years P123

[BosnianBlue]

Lol, This Momblano idiot mumbled so many shit he's gonna be made to look an absolute tit on the end.

 

[aguero93:20]

So, still not announced then eh?

Unsurprising.

 

[Citizen Green]

So, still not announced then eh?

Unsurprising.

Just waiting on us to be banned mate so Pep can activate his non existent 'release clause'.

 

[aguero93:20]

Just waiting on us to be banned mate so Pep can activate his non existent 'release clause'.

So after our not happening ban happens, he'll activate a non existent clause, to make a move he has zero interest in making?

Sounds legit.

 

[Metalartin]

Are Juventus fans turning into the Italian dippers? They think they are entitled to Pep because of this trial by media City are facing? So many of them talking high and mighty about City, when they were involved arguably the biggest scandal in European football not so long ago... and City could yet prove their innocence before all is said and done.

This is all just wishful(desperate) thinking and I wont change that opinion until Pep himself confirms any of it. Very much a case of believe it when you see it... can't see how anyone doesn't think that's the best way to deal with this.

 

[Uffa]

That Momblano idiot is spouting more shit than an elephants ass "What results to us immediately is that Guardiola is worried and annoyed by the corporate folds of the City, so almost regardless of the sentence because we all know (all the more who works in the City) that at the helm of that club there is a potentate. The clause is a scenario initially held there, then thoroughly investigated by the person in charge to have a possible guarantee route to reach the end for which the parties have committed themselves. We can go quietly until mid-month, not only due to the technical deadline of the clause in question. We can go there because we are Juventus, even if it seems paradoxical."

How in the fuck is he supposed to know what Pep has in his contract? Also we have contradicting evidence that there even is such a clause. He has said time and time again he isn't coming. Could a journalist get taken to court for shit like this? If not he should be able to be.

First, as Citizen said, ignore it and calm down.
Secondly, why the hell should he be taken to court? Lol

 

[Citizen Green]

So after our not happening ban happens, he'll activate a non existent clause, to make a move he has zero interest in making?

Sounds legit.

That's pretty much it yeah

 

[Javi Garcia's Hairstylist]

I'm still waiting to hear why Pep wants to go to a one-team league with 1/10th the global profile and to a club with less money, less enterprise value, immeasurably less suited to his style (in terms of personnel) and arguably with less chance to win the CL.

 

[SWP's back]

First, as Citizen said, ignore it and calm down.
Secondly, why the hell should he be taken to court? Lol

Libel

 

[Uffa]

Libel

You must be kidding. Any sports journalist should be in jail by now if you consider what he wrote to be defamation.

Here's an article that explains libel for you: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2006/aug/31/news.politicsandthemedia