Gushing over royals

Not entirely correct. Buck house is currently being refurbished courtesy of a multi million pound grant voted by parliament last year.
And the Crown Estates revenues go straight to HMRC and more than cover any cost.
 
MQ2ng2Y.jpg


Lady Amelia Windsor is best looking Royal IMO.
 
if theres a net contribution why are we paying them each year and having to pay for their house to be decorated .........................
Because you and everybody who isnt titled are peasants, commoners, and they are special people.

and you should learn to bow and scrape to your betters

and pay for them to live in the lap of luxury on their thousands of acres
 
Didn't know she was pregnant till I read this.
Also thought she only had one spoilt brat already not two.
 
ok lizzy is queen n charlie and the boys are possible heirs so I suppose they should get some coverge while we still have a monarchy and a palce and some dosh, but every other **** in that family from anne, andrew, edward, their kids, pippa and the rest should not get an inch of print or any public money free gaffs to live in or freebies.

Personally I would abolish the lot.
Are they even Charle' s kids ??.
If not there no more royal than me
 
I'm a Royalist always have been but once Lizzie croaks that's it for me, i just cannot warm to wishy washy Charles
Being a Royalist means you support the Institution rather than the people who are in post at any particular moment in time.
So your statement means you are NOT a royalist and you have therefore contradicted yourself in the same sentence.
Well done.
 
Seeking for respite from news about N Korea & Brexit, all I see or hear is 3rd sprog for skinny Kate.

I suppose some folk are interested, and it sells tabloids.

It's the sad fuckers with jubilee and royal wedding tea sets who get to me. I'd put that on the same level as taxidermy in terms of what will get me to leave your house promptly.

It's not that I've got anything against the priveleged cunts, it's just that I can't agree with what they symbolise and the fawning they seem to inspire in certain people who think that having the world class talent to be squished out of a very specific vadge is in any way an achievement deserving of a lifetime of reward and adulation.
 
Being a Royalist means you support the Institution rather than the people who are in post at any particular moment in time.
So your statement means you are NOT a royalist and you have therefore contradicted yourself in the same sentence.
Well done.
I'm a silly Billy aren't i, thank you for pointing it out, i shall now don sack cloth and ashes and do 3 months penance, thank you for your help, well done
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.