sweynforkbeard
Well-Known Member
andyhinch said:
A revocation of responsibility, andyh.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Heywood....kicking off?
- Thread starter JamesMCFC
- Start date
A revocation of responsibility, andyh.
sweynforkbeard
Well-Known Member
MCFCTrick said:sweynforkbeard said:Systemic failure, abrogation of responsibility, PC fear of causing offence, discriminatory attitudes towards white working class girls from, 'poor council estate backgrounds.' Combination of factors that lead to a perfect storm of appalling neglect.
Anything but come out with naming and shaming the 'group' of people responsible for all this....
Here is a clue, straight from one of the 'group' of people just last night that I heard direct in a cab from Castleton to my home...
''They just white sluts innit? Doesn't count to me and my bro's. Jus' ho's, they love it''
It was a group of British Pakistani males who abused these girls - my post referred to the reasons this abuse was not dealt with earlier and you seem to misunderstand this. We all know who the abusers were - heinous criminals, and doubtless the attitude you reference still exists. It will keep on existing if it is swept under the carpet and the agencies responsible for caring for and protecting vulnerable adolescents fail as abysmally as they did in Rochdale/Heywood and elsewhere.
bluemanc
Well-Known Member
<a class="postlink" href="http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1593378_nine-men-appear-in-court-charged-over-sexual-exploitation-of-teenage-girl-in-rochdale" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... n-rochdale</a>
Nine men are due to appear in court in connection with an investigation into the alleged sexual exploitation of a young girl in Rochdale.
The defendants are to make their first appearance in court to face the charges that offences were committed separately against the teenager between 2008 and 2009.
Freddy Kendakumana, 26, of Illminster, Rochdale, has been charged with three counts of rape, attempted rape and four counts of sexual activity with a child under 16.
Roheez Khan, 26, of Ashfield Road, Rochdale, is accused of 10 counts of sexual activity with a child under 16.
Chola Chansa, 32, of Illminster, Rochdale, has been charged with two counts of sexual activity with a child under 16.
Ali Asghar Hussain Shah, 39, of Lyefield Walk, Rochdale, is accused of sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16.
Anjam Masood, 30, of Marne Crescent, Rochdale, has been charged with sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16.
Asrar Haider, 38, of Chamber House Drive, Castleton, Rochdale, is accused of sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16.
Abdul Huk, 36, of Ouldfield Close, Rochdale, has been charged with sexual activity with a child under 16.
Mohammed Rafiq, 31, of Allington, Freehold, Rochdale, is accused of sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16. Mohammed Ali, 27, of Exbury, Rochdale has been charged with sexual activity with a child under 16.
All are due to attend Bury Magistrates' Court where the case is expected to be sent to a Crown Court.
A CPS Lawyer has been moved,a Lord Chief Justice in the making.
Nine men are due to appear in court in connection with an investigation into the alleged sexual exploitation of a young girl in Rochdale.
The defendants are to make their first appearance in court to face the charges that offences were committed separately against the teenager between 2008 and 2009.
Freddy Kendakumana, 26, of Illminster, Rochdale, has been charged with three counts of rape, attempted rape and four counts of sexual activity with a child under 16.
Roheez Khan, 26, of Ashfield Road, Rochdale, is accused of 10 counts of sexual activity with a child under 16.
Chola Chansa, 32, of Illminster, Rochdale, has been charged with two counts of sexual activity with a child under 16.
Ali Asghar Hussain Shah, 39, of Lyefield Walk, Rochdale, is accused of sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16.
Anjam Masood, 30, of Marne Crescent, Rochdale, has been charged with sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16.
Asrar Haider, 38, of Chamber House Drive, Castleton, Rochdale, is accused of sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16.
Abdul Huk, 36, of Ouldfield Close, Rochdale, has been charged with sexual activity with a child under 16.
Mohammed Rafiq, 31, of Allington, Freehold, Rochdale, is accused of sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16. Mohammed Ali, 27, of Exbury, Rochdale has been charged with sexual activity with a child under 16.
All are due to attend Bury Magistrates' Court where the case is expected to be sent to a Crown Court.
A CPS Lawyer has been moved,a Lord Chief Justice in the making.
Blootoof
Well-Known Member
And the rest....
My daughter , aged 21 , got off the train at Castleton too after the Ajax game. I stayed on till Rochdale but kept in touch with her on the phone . She told me that the Asian taxi drivers are a shower of cunts and are always trying it on with her. I ring her stepdad cos we get on and he's always waiting at the door for her . She tells me that they treat white girls like shit but when somebody else is in the cab with them . . they dont say a word.sweynforkbeard said:MCFCTrick said:sweynforkbeard said:Systemic failure, abrogation of responsibility, PC fear of causing offence, discriminatory attitudes towards white working class girls from, 'poor council estate backgrounds.' Combination of factors that lead to a perfect storm of appalling neglect.
Anything but come out with naming and shaming the 'group' of people responsible for all this....
Here is a clue, straight from one of the 'group' of people just last night that I heard direct in a cab from Castleton to my home...
''They just white sluts innit? Doesn't count to me and my bro's. Jus' ho's, they love it''
It was a group of British Pakistani males who abused these girls - my post referred to the reasons this abuse was not dealt with earlier and you seem to misunderstand this. We all know who the abusers were - heinous criminals, and doubtless the attitude you reference still exists. It will keep on existing if it is swept under the carpet and the agencies responsible for caring for and protecting vulnerable adolescents fail as abysmally as they did in Rochdale/Heywood and elsewhere.
bluemanc
Well-Known Member
Well they have 180+cases to go through so i'd say the rest will be found with the publicity surrounding the abuse.Blootoof said:And the rest....
MCFCTrick
Well-Known Member
bluemanc said:Well they have 180+cases to go through so i'd say the rest will be found with the publicity surrounding the abuse.Blootoof said:And the rest....
And I would bet anything, that not a one of them will have the balls to admit to the charges. As cast iron as they may be.
Same when caught for acts of terrorism.....never have the cojones to say, 'Too right, I meant to kill and maim, I hate all infidels'.
Fuckin cowards.
bluemanc said:http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1593378_nine-men-appear-in-court-charged-over-sexual-exploitation-of-teenage-girl-in-rochdale
Nine men are due to appear in court in connection with an investigation into the alleged sexual exploitation of a young girl in Rochdale.
The defendants are to make their first appearance in court to face the charges that offences were committed separately against the teenager between 2008 and 2009.
Freddy Kendakumana, 26, of Illminster, Rochdale, has been charged with three counts of rape, attempted rape and four counts of sexual activity with a child under 16.
Roheez Khan, 26, of Ashfield Road, Rochdale, is accused of 10 counts of sexual activity with a child under 16.
Chola Chansa, 32, of Illminster, Rochdale, has been charged with two counts of sexual activity with a child under 16.
Ali Asghar Hussain Shah, 39, of Lyefield Walk, Rochdale, is accused of sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16.
Anjam Masood, 30, of Marne Crescent, Rochdale, has been charged with sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16.
Asrar Haider, 38, of Chamber House Drive, Castleton, Rochdale, is accused of sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16.
Abdul Huk, 36, of Ouldfield Close, Rochdale, has been charged with sexual activity with a child under 16.
Mohammed Rafiq, 31, of Allington, Freehold, Rochdale, is accused of sexual activity and inciting sexual activity with a child under 16. Mohammed Ali, 27, of Exbury, Rochdale has been charged with sexual activity with a child under 16.
All are due to attend Bury Magistrates' Court where the case is expected to be sent to a Crown Court.
A CPS Lawyer has been moved,a Lord Chief Justice in the making.
so no obvious common denominator then?
bluemanc
Well-Known Member
<a class="postlink" href="http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1594048_two-more-council-bosses-and-a-detective-face-grooming-quiz-over-rochdale-sex-gang" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... e-sex-gang</a>
Two former childcare bosses at Rochdale council and a top detective are to be questioned at a parliamentary grooming inquiry.
Cheryl Eastwood, who was director of children’s services until this summer, and Steve Garner, who quit as director of targeted services last month, will appear before MPs on Tuesday.
Det Chief Supt Mary Doyle, who is leading a string of child abuse inquiries across Greater Manchester, will also be quizzed.
They will be asked what they knew before and during the grooming scandal that rocked Rochdale.
Committee members will also want to know how police have changed their practices to better protect children. In May, nine men were jailed for plying girls from Rochdale with drink and drugs before sexually abusing them.
The council has since been slammed for failing to take the complaints of victims and staff seriously over a number of years.
Police have also been criticised for not working closely enough with other public authorities. Earlier this month, a sexual health worker, Sara Rowbotham, told the committee she had reported 181 cases of child grooming to the authorities between 2004 and 2008, when police finally began investigating. She said she had been excluded from high-level talks with council officers and police – and broke down as she said the teenagers had been treated ‘appallingly’. The committee is expected to demand an explanation from both Ms Eastwood and Mr Garner. Ms Eastwood was legally responsible for the council’s children’s services until July, when she retired after the full scale of the abuse was exposed.
Mr Garner quit a week after a damning safeguarding report highlighted a string of council failures. Det Chief Supt Doyle, who also appeared before the committee earlier this year, will be asked to explain how police have changed the way they handle grooming allegations.
At last week’s hearing former council chief executive Roger Ellis was asked to reveal his pay-off when he took early retirement earlier this year. It is understood the council is planning to waive its confidentiality agreement with Mr Ellis and provide the figure to MPs by Tuesday’s hearing.
Wonder who that lot will blame.
Two former childcare bosses at Rochdale council and a top detective are to be questioned at a parliamentary grooming inquiry.
Cheryl Eastwood, who was director of children’s services until this summer, and Steve Garner, who quit as director of targeted services last month, will appear before MPs on Tuesday.
Det Chief Supt Mary Doyle, who is leading a string of child abuse inquiries across Greater Manchester, will also be quizzed.
They will be asked what they knew before and during the grooming scandal that rocked Rochdale.
Committee members will also want to know how police have changed their practices to better protect children. In May, nine men were jailed for plying girls from Rochdale with drink and drugs before sexually abusing them.
The council has since been slammed for failing to take the complaints of victims and staff seriously over a number of years.
Police have also been criticised for not working closely enough with other public authorities. Earlier this month, a sexual health worker, Sara Rowbotham, told the committee she had reported 181 cases of child grooming to the authorities between 2004 and 2008, when police finally began investigating. She said she had been excluded from high-level talks with council officers and police – and broke down as she said the teenagers had been treated ‘appallingly’. The committee is expected to demand an explanation from both Ms Eastwood and Mr Garner. Ms Eastwood was legally responsible for the council’s children’s services until July, when she retired after the full scale of the abuse was exposed.
Mr Garner quit a week after a damning safeguarding report highlighted a string of council failures. Det Chief Supt Doyle, who also appeared before the committee earlier this year, will be asked to explain how police have changed the way they handle grooming allegations.
At last week’s hearing former council chief executive Roger Ellis was asked to reveal his pay-off when he took early retirement earlier this year. It is understood the council is planning to waive its confidentiality agreement with Mr Ellis and provide the figure to MPs by Tuesday’s hearing.
Wonder who that lot will blame.
bluemanc
Well-Known Member
<a class="postlink" href="http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1596711_rochdale-council-is-still-failing-children-after-sex-abuse-scandal-report-says" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... eport-says</a>
Jump to Navigation
News
Rochdale council ‘is still failing children’ after sex abuse scandal, report
Chris Jones
Rochdale council is still not doing enough to protect children and young people, a critical government report has concluded.
Ofsted officials swooped on the authority last month to assess if the council was keeping young people safe from harm.
The surprise eight-day review came days after a committee of MPs heard that children’s social services were alerted 181 times that teens were being sexually abused, but failed to intervene because they thought youngsters were old enough to make their own decisions. Nine men were jailed in May after being convicted of grooming girls.
Inspectors rated the authority’s ability to protect youngsters as inadequate, adding the council ‘is not doing what is required to keep children and young people safe’.
They also slammed the Rochdale Borough Safeguarding Children’s Board, which reviews individual cases where children needed protecting, for ‘not asking sufficiently challenging questions’.
However, they did praise frontline social workers commitment, said some elements of the service were adequate and acknowledged that a new leadership had been drafted to turn the department around.
Despite slapping an overall inadequate rating on the council, Ofsted said the council’s effectiveness and quality of practice were adequate, adding they didn’t identify any child who was at significant risk of harm during their inspection.
Ofsted reserved its lowest inadequate rating for senior managers, who they said ‘lacked urgency’. But they said the failings of previous bosses, who have now left the council, were being turned round by a new top team who have taken ‘swift and effective action’.
Merry Christmas.
Jump to Navigation
News
Rochdale council ‘is still failing children’ after sex abuse scandal, report
Chris Jones
Rochdale council is still not doing enough to protect children and young people, a critical government report has concluded.
Ofsted officials swooped on the authority last month to assess if the council was keeping young people safe from harm.
The surprise eight-day review came days after a committee of MPs heard that children’s social services were alerted 181 times that teens were being sexually abused, but failed to intervene because they thought youngsters were old enough to make their own decisions. Nine men were jailed in May after being convicted of grooming girls.
Inspectors rated the authority’s ability to protect youngsters as inadequate, adding the council ‘is not doing what is required to keep children and young people safe’.
They also slammed the Rochdale Borough Safeguarding Children’s Board, which reviews individual cases where children needed protecting, for ‘not asking sufficiently challenging questions’.
However, they did praise frontline social workers commitment, said some elements of the service were adequate and acknowledged that a new leadership had been drafted to turn the department around.
Despite slapping an overall inadequate rating on the council, Ofsted said the council’s effectiveness and quality of practice were adequate, adding they didn’t identify any child who was at significant risk of harm during their inspection.
Ofsted reserved its lowest inadequate rating for senior managers, who they said ‘lacked urgency’. But they said the failings of previous bosses, who have now left the council, were being turned round by a new top team who have taken ‘swift and effective action’.
Gladys would appear to have only read the end of the report,she actually blamed the goverment for setting the rules governing child abuse. Does not bode well, she's probaly better at bullshitting & hiding stuff that she doesn't want to come out though.Gladys Rhodes White, the council’s interim executive director for children’s services, said: "Ofsted acknowledged the improvements we have made, so whilst the overall outcome is a concern, the report recognises the significant steps we have taken to get our child protection service on the right tracks.
We are absolutely determined to continue making progress, ensuring children and young people are better protected in the borough.
Merry Christmas.