Impeccable
Well-Known Member
Dannyctid said:Wayne Bridge is uncertain how many of his mates have been through hes ex.
Have to admit.... that is funny!
Dannyctid said:Wayne Bridge is uncertain how many of his mates have been through hes ex.
Soulboy said:I'm sure there is loads of uncertainty at the club at the present time... just like every other organisation in the country today! I am having to deal with pay cuts, redundancies, early retirements, cutbacks... as is just about every other business in Britain today.
I don't think football clubs are unique in this, and City certainly aren't unique.
There will be uncertainty at Chelsea now... will Ancellotti survive? Will half the first team squad survive? Even at the Rags... how much longer will baconface keep going? How will the fringe players such as Gibson, Wellbeck, Marcheda et al do next season? Is the club going to be taken over any day soon?
Every club in the country has similar tales of uncertainty. Not just us.
I would go as far as to suggest that uncertainty is inherent to the role of a footballer and the running of a club. You don't have half yearly or quarterly targets... you have targets every single game! How could it be anything other than uncertainty?
Will it affect the perfortmance of the team? Maybe. It depends on the quality of the manager in charge of things, and like Billy Shears states, that includes those ABOVE Mancini.
But the fact that there is speculation about Mourinho taking over (and that is all it is at the present time...) is something EVERY manager has to deal with throughout his career, as does EVERY player throughout his career.
That's why they are paid so fucking much!
In fact, the speculation might actually improve performances if the targetted individuals want to keep their jobs. But I'm sure a top quality manager like Mancini wouldn't let him bother him at all.
Nelly's Left Foot said:Soulboy said:I'm sure there is loads of uncertainty at the club at the present time... just like every other organisation in the country today! I am having to deal with pay cuts, redundancies, early retirements, cutbacks... as is just about every other business in Britain today.
I don't think football clubs are unique in this, and City certainly aren't unique.
There will be uncertainty at Chelsea now... will Ancellotti survive? Will half the first team squad survive? Even at the Rags... how much longer will baconface keep going? How will the fringe players such as Gibson, Wellbeck, Marcheda et al do next season? Is the club going to be taken over any day soon?
Every club in the country has similar tales of uncertainty. Not just us.
I would go as far as to suggest that uncertainty is inherent to the role of a footballer and the running of a club. You don't have half yearly or quarterly targets... you have targets every single game! How could it be anything other than uncertainty?
Will it affect the perfortmance of the team? Maybe. It depends on the quality of the manager in charge of things, and like Billy Shears states, that includes those ABOVE Mancini.
But the fact that there is speculation about Mourinho taking over (and that is all it is at the present time...) is something EVERY manager has to deal with throughout his career, as does EVERY player throughout his career.
That's why they are paid so fucking much!
In fact, the speculation might actually improve performances if the targetted individuals want to keep their jobs. But I'm sure a top quality manager like Mancini wouldn't let him bother him at all.
I am not really fussed about whether it is bothering Mancini but I am if it is affecting the players in any way.
Soulboy said:Nelly's Left Foot said:I am not really fussed about whether it is bothering Mancini but I am if it is affecting the players in any way.
What's affecting the players?
Nelly's Left Foot said:Soulboy said:What's affecting the players?
Maybe that they aren't comfortable, sure about the way Mancini is going about things both in preparation and in matches?
Marvin said:results suggest that if there's any uncertainty it's not impacting on the players performances.
Why does DD always post such negative posts?
The Fat el Hombre said:There shouldn't be uncertainty. They have a target of getting into the top four and they should all be pulling together to make that happen. They should all be focussed on that and nothing else, there is no uncertainty about it - break the top four. If there is uncertainty, you have to ask why it is affecting some players and not others.
Marvin said:results suggest that if there's any uncertainty it's not impacting on the players performances.
Why does DD always post such negative posts?
Nelly's Left Foot said:Marvin said:results suggest that if there's any uncertainty it's not impacting on the players performances.
Why does DD always post such negative posts?
Which results are they? The 3 against Stokewhere we couldnt win, the draws against Lpool and Sunderland , the defeat at Hull or should we just remember the Chelsea win?
bizzbo said:Weak players use this kind of thing as an excuse. Winners plough on regardless, they only care about winning once they have crossed the white line.
BillyShears said:The business end of the season is upon us, and every time a player gets on the park, they've got something to play for...we'll know much more about a lot of them in two months time.