It's all rhythm of attack, something Rodri orchestrates so well for us (amongst his other roles)
I felt the issue against Southampton was we didn't force them to defend in a desperate & tiring manner until the second half. The play was in front of them and probing for a gap, which let them stay in a shape.
It's not ideal to have teams defend this way, but we also kept interrupting our rhythm by whacking it off for a goal kick, or making stupid errors like misplacing passes when circulating the ball.
From this position, Foden hits a nothing cross and it takes us another minute to generate an attack.
If we had just maintained the pressure for that minute, it may let us find a gap.
In the second half, we obviously changed to use wingers more, which automatically disrupted Southampton - but we also maintained a better rhythm and pinned them in, which created far better chances that we should've taken.
This is comparable to Saturday - below screenshot is our last attack prior to their goal.
Savinho puts it behind for a goal kick from here, playing a ball that's never on.
Had he played to Akanji, we could continue to probe Palace.
From that goal kick, we've fallen victim to an orchestrated routine of playing short, we press and they play long ball to get it round the corner for the wing back to then cross for Eze. It's similar build up to their first goal at the Etihad.
O'Reilly failed to track Munoz for a split second.
How we attack has a huge bearing on how, or when we need to defend.
These two incidents just highlight that rushed or poor attacks is more of the issue, rather than manipulating a team's shape through patient play.
The style of defending is to simply reduce the margins down to a single goal, or a well drilled set piece (even goal kicks now) - our main counter is to force teams to defend for long stretches of play, or force a gap that players like Foden (remember the top corner goals last seaon) will take advantage of.
Look across PL games and see how many are won by the teams with lower possession at the moment. A majority of mid table teams have adopted this same playing style, prioritising quick breaks. The parked bus isn't new, but teams having top quality players and extreme interpretations of parking the bus is, coupled with being better in initial phases (so many just used to hoof into the channel)
Overall, I feel we've been caught between two eras of the team, but also our last two games have showcased how vital rhythm is to our play, alongside the tight margins. When teams play to make it this fine, penalties etc must be exploited. When we aren't firing like we have in previous seasons, the risk of falling victim to the margins is higher.