Huddersfield v City post match

[Millwallawayveteran1988]

It comes to something when a team in the championship also play the reserves because of a league game.

There have been instances of league one and two sides doing the same. Shame. Huddersfield could have won that had they played their best side against that one we put out and now they have a replay which surely doesn't help them at all. Seems crazy to me.

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

Rag

can i add a :) before you apply for the

Who doesn't agree with me?

just about everyone :)

 

[SebastianBlue]

Just finished working so didn't get to see any of the match. Were we utter gash or unlucky? Wondered whether we had one of those days when we just didn't look like scoring? Is it worth watching the highlights at all???

You'll be hard pressed to find any highlights mate.

 

[dowty]

Kev looked off the pace when he came on, that was the worse game I have seen Navas play, and Bravo is on par with my mum as a keeper.

But we are still in the hat, that game had banana skin wrote all over it ( Not least because of the Altringcham ref ) so I will take a replay at our place as a good result for how we played.

Dont worry, I think he will be limited to cup games.

I hope

 

[blueinsa]

Barely is a matter of opinion. We had far more possession and the better chances in the game. Bravo had to make a couple of saves but they were hardly difficult saves and he was never exposed in the way he has been far too often in the EPL.

Huddersfield worked very hard and tried hard not to let City settle, which worked to a degree.

City lacked creativity and style etc and we all know why but going back to the original post I commented on, they were not more than a match for us and such statements are typical of the crass overreactions this site sees when we don't convincingly batter our opponents.

Completely agree mate.

 

[Ezra]

Jesus will save us.

You'll have to sever his umbilical chord then! ;0)

 

[BlueMojito]

You'll be hard pressed to find any highlights mate.

That bad hey?

 

[prestonibbo_mcfc]

for these game we need a better balance of young players and the first team. delph, fernando, navas aren't good enough for us, so why not play some young players and first teamers.

After today's performance, you can add Nolito to that list.

 

[Feed the Elk]

Barely is a matter of opinion. We had far more possession and the better chances in the game. Bravo had to make a couple of saves but they were hardly difficult saves and he was never exposed in the way he has been far too often in the EPL.

Huddersfield worked very hard and tried hard not to let City settle, which worked to a degree.

City lacked creativity and style etc and we all know why but going back to the original post I commented on, they were not more than a match for us and such statements are typical of the crass overreactions this site sees when we don't convincingly batter our opponents.

You can't dispute that they were a match for us and in my opinion, i think they were more than a match for us. When it got to around the 80th minute and we were meandering through the last ten minutes, it wouldn't have come as a surprise to anyone if they would have scored.

And putting it into context, this was their second string

 

[Barcon]

He played more like Tevez today. Thought we should've put Nacho on near the end, because Aguero was doing fine as an attacking mid, but we needed a striker in the box. Nacho would've been most likely to get on the end of Navas' one good cross (which was one more than Sane, by the way...).

We were only allowed three subs.