Hughes calls for clarity over Tevez row, MuEN block comments

[bernabias home shirt]

At the end of the day Mr Brennan the MUEN pays your wages so you are hardly going to come on here and state that they are anti-City are you?

No. The reason I came on here to state that the MEN is not anti-City is because it isn't.
You can obnviously believe what you want, but you are plain wrong. I work there, every day, and see what people say, and what gos on, and know about editorial policy and so on.
You selectively read what you want to read, and hear what you want to hear. It is you who have the agenda.

On that note, I'd better get some bloody work done, or I'll be getting the sack.
And you can pack in that cheering as well!

But then you blew it saying the red tops wernt biased...i mean come on stuart ffs!

 

[sixlashes]

fair play to you sb for coming on here and answering the questions put to you BUT
trying to defend some of your articles as proper journalism is quite laughable. After reading that racist piece of crap in the daily fail(you wrote) its a good job our owners arent black or jewish eh?

 

[redmizzle]

Can you name me one City story from the past three years which, if it had happened at United, would not have made the papers?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2022849/Manchester-City-striker-Mario-Balotelli-attacks-training-dummy.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... dummy.html</a>

 

[johnny crossan]

Correct through gritted teeth though,but still nice to see the smarmy twat say sorry..thanks again miss kloss!

Actually, it was nothing to do with Vicky Kloss in the original and came about by I emailed him and told him that he was wrong. He claimed to hear a report on Sky Sports News on the day of the Sunderland game that Mancini was in the stadium at the time, which was false, but the report did happen. SSN issued a correction around half time or something and it was never mentioned again. It was one of those things that he half remembered and built an entire foundation of logic on top of it. It doesn't help that he's a big mate of Hughes from his time at Chelsea (as he's a big Chelsea fan). He thought he was sticking up for his mate against disgraceful behaviour.

When he looked into it (luckily, Mancini gave an interview on the same day to Sky Italia), he immediately rang Vicky Kloss off of his own back to apologise, then issued an apology live on air the next week.

I've still got the email chains in my inbox probably.

Rubbish, the alleged presence of Mancini at the Sunderland game was first reported by the BBC, SSN weren't involved. The "live on air apology the following week" is as I have just pointed out pure fantasy on your part as is the lie that it was nothing to do with Vicky Kloss. Would you like to see an extract of her email to me the day after the match in which she recounts exactly what happened with Beasley? Shameful.

 

[Damocles]

Just for reference

Hate Fuelled Envy broadcast - November 21 2010

Two word unspecified broadcast "apology" January 9th 2011

But check out all the other biased slime on Sky for yourself if you've got a few hours
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/user/johnnycrossan?feature=mhee" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/user/johnnycrossan?feature=mhee</a>

For a blue to seek to defend these hacks or deny the anti City Sky agenda is (putting it as inoffensively as possible) despicable.

Date of Beasley finding out that he was incorrect: 25th November 2010
Date of Beasley emailing a written apology over to City: 25th November 2010.

People do stupid things at times. He did a stupid thing, Beasley has actually been quite supportive of City in the long haul

 

[squirtyflower]

Can you name me one City story from the past three years which, if it had happened at United, would not have made the papers?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2022849/Manchester-City-striker-Mario-Balotelli-attacks-training-dummy.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... dummy.html</a>

that article is a complete disgrace

a made up story around some photos that landed on the sports desk
in fact the reporter was so proud of it he put his name to it...................oh

 

[Welcome to Manchester]

At the end of the day Mr Brennan the MUEN pays your wages so you are hardly going to come on here and state that they are anti-City are you?

No. The reason I came on here to state that the MEN is not anti-City is because it isn't.
You can obnviously believe what you want, but you are plain wrong. I work there, every day, and see what people say, and what gos on, and know about editorial policy and so on.
You selectively read what you want to read, and hear what you want to hear. It is you who have the agenda.

On that note, I'd better get some bloody work done, or I'll be getting the sack.
And you can pack in that cheering as well!

Oh so I have an agenda do I Mr Brennan?
The FACTS I quoted to you are based on my personal experience and that of many others I know - or are you calling me a liar?
I've noticed you've got nothing to say about the bias shown by your chief sports editor though.
You are further proof that having a reasonable conversation with a RAG is impossible.
MUEN - written for rags by rags, the sooner it goes under the better.

 

[Damocles]

At the end of the day Mr Brennan the MUEN pays your wages so you are hardly going to come on here and state that they are anti-City are you?

No. The reason I came on here to state that the MEN is not anti-City is because it isn't.
You can obnviously believe what you want, but you are plain wrong. I work there, every day, and see what people say, and what gos on, and know about editorial policy and so on.
You selectively read what you want to read, and hear what you want to hear. It is you who have the agenda.

On that note, I'd better get some bloody work done, or I'll be getting the sack.
And you can pack in that cheering as well!

Oh so I have an agenda do I Mr Brennan?
The FACTS I quoted to you are based on my personal experience and that of many others I know - or are you calling me a liar?
I've noticed you've got nothing to say about the bias shown by your chief sports editor though.
You are further proof that having a reasonable conversation with a RAG is impossible.
MUEN - written for rags by rags, the sooner it goes under the better.

I'm not sure you really understand what those things are.

 

[SuperKevinHorlock]

I give up on any so called city fan defending Sky that is beyond a joke, thanks Mr Brennan for proving me right that most journalists are as honest as politicians.


Luckily I stopped buying the MEN a few months ago I just read the free MUEN on a thurs/Friday I think the Tevez caught speeding article(full page spread) whilst the two line rag player done for speeding was the final straw.

 

[Welcome to Manchester]

No. The reason I came on here to state that the MEN is not anti-City is because it isn't.
You can obnviously believe what you want, but you are plain wrong. I work there, every day, and see what people say, and what gos on, and know about editorial policy and so on.
You selectively read what you want to read, and hear what you want to hear. It is you who have the agenda.

On that note, I'd better get some bloody work done, or I'll be getting the sack.
And you can pack in that cheering as well!

Oh so I have an agenda do I Mr Brennan?
The FACTS I quoted to you are based on my personal experience and that of many others I know - or are you calling me a liar?
I've noticed you've got nothing to say about the bias shown by your chief sports editor though.
You are further proof that having a reasonable conversation with a RAG is impossible.
MUEN - written for rags by rags, the sooner it goes under the better.

I'm not sure you really understand what those things are.

Basically the facts I quoted are that numerous comments I submitted on the MUEN website were blocked while rags were given carte blanche to write whatever they like.
That was my experience.

Do you UNDERSTAND that?