pudge said:
Dax777 said:
Yes, it would have been, if your opinion mattered. As it doesn't... Well!
Oh I'm sorry,
enlighten me as too how your opinion (which you seem to have on every footballer in the world seeing as you've seen every single one play since their career started, or at least you get on like you have) is more relevant than mine?
Did I say it was? Don't think so. Just certain yours doesn't.
-- Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:04 pm --
Tricky Dickys Right Foot Shot said:
I watched him today seemed alright quick player, but seems a bit greedy now and again still though we have the best Spaniard in the Prem so they can shove Mata up their arse...
I disagree with none of this, yet I still feel he was ours for the taking long before he became irrelevant to the discussion of getting him.
-- Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:06 pm --
adrianr said:
I'd still rather have signed Mata than Nasri before today's game; I'm still not entirely sure Nasri will be the missing link (isn't bloody everyone? :D) some on here are saying, however missing out on Mata and signing Nasri instead is a bit like missing out on Megan Fox and still getting to bang Rosie Huntington Whitely. It may not be what you originally wanted, but it's an epic shit-load better than fuck all.
This was what I was trying to say before the boo birds went all Timothy McVeigh on my OP and Pudge decided he'd rather get personal :I
Bloody hell, it is an effing forum FFS!