The blue phantom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 8,736
But you never answered the question?Fortunately, that will never happen.
But you never answered the question?Fortunately, that will never happen.
The big problem with your approach is the ‘may as well be hung for a sheep as well as a lamb’ mantra. If paedophiles were routinely executed then the number of child murders would unquestionably go through the roof.What a tired response!
What does the US justice system have to do with this? If my name was MossleyBlue, would it have made it easier to stay on topic?
We are discussing whether someone who committed horrendous acts with and against minors is able to be rehabilitated by being put in a secure facility where he is not going to get stabbed, beaten or anally raped to death? I think the answer is “No.” and he has self-selected himself OUT of our so-called civilized society.
As such, I see no redeeming value in locking him away in a concrete box waiting for the inevitable. He made his choice and I’ve made mine.
Death. Goodbye and good riddance.
The big problem with your approach is the ‘may as well be hung for a sheep as well as a lamb’ mantra. If paedophiles were routinely executed then the number of child murders would unquestionably go through the roof.
Presumably that’s a price you are willing to pay to satisfy your blood lust.
No, i didn't and don't have to.But you never answered the question?
Assumes facts not in evidence.The big problem with your approach is the ‘may as well be hung for a sheep as well as a lamb’ mantra. If paedophiles were routinely executed then the number of child murders would unquestionably go through the roof.
Presumably that’s a price you are willing to pay to satisfy your blood lust.
So, you think YOU would let your uncle keep reaming your kid and not report him if it meant, if convicted, he might be executed???And also discourage victims of intrafamilial abuse from ever reporting their male relatives because they know there's a chance they are causing their death.
Adding impossible feelings of guilt to victims who may already suffer with feelings of internalised shame and worthlessness.
There's absolutely no upside from a such a policy.
So, you think YOU would let your uncle keep reaming your kid and not report him if it meant, if convicted, he might be executed???
Nice.
Not much “upside” there for your kid, eh?!
Who said anything about “public”?No I think in some circumstances abused victims wouldn't come forward because of that and would conceal it from their parents or guardians.
It's not unheard of victims of such abuse to keep quiet about their abusive uncle, father, brother or grandfather to not rock the boat of the wider family.
Adding that into the equation naturally adds to the unbearable weight of guilt on their shoulders that some victims experience (reporting such abuse is not something they should feel guilty about, but that's not how severe emotional trauma works).
I'm not sure how a public hanging of their abuser does anything for someone with complex emotional trauma.
Congratulations. You are now 50% of the way to earning your first MAGA hat.Who said anything about “public”?
And, you can make the same familial argument about almost EVERY crime that would label the criminal a felon and put them inside.
People make personal choices about the crimes perpetrated against them, but, as a society, we should set a minimum standard of behavior that should not be that hard to uphold.
From there, there’s a sliding scale of punishments…with torture, murder and the exploitation of children on the far end of the scale.
Hang ‘em high!
Yawn.Congratulations. You are now 50% of the way to earning your first MAGA hat.