If Garry Cook is guilty of anything...

[tolmie's hairdoo]

It is one of hypocrisy.

He simply decided he liked his job more than he liked Mark Hughes.

He was the man who appointed him and as such, his choice was found wanting.

But for anyone to suggest that Cook in particular, is pulling the strings is a little naive.

The Sheik made the decision, not Cook, not Marwood.

Khaldoon is his man and trusts him implicity, but even he has to pay the piper, ultimately.

I just can't believe that our generous owner is so unbelievably rich, he gives us little thought.

He is THE man.

 

[Anonymous]

Garry Cook may have appointed him but he appointed him when Frank was still in charge,

 

[GStar]

He's his own AC Milan... where was yesterday?

I don't think he's pulling the strings, because he seems completely inept... He'll have our spirals painted red next season!

 

[yozzer]

finally the owners put there own manager in ...now clear cook and start again ..cook is a slimeball

 

[BlueAdamski]

The problem with Cook is the way he goes about things. He is an embarrassment to the club. A bit of decency and integrity costs nothing, and he has neither. Let's not forget that this is the buffoon who suggested that Kaka had bottled it, just because he decided not to join us. Who exactly is he to decide that one of the best footballers in the world is a bottler?

And now he has dragged the good name of the club into the gutter again by the shoddy manner in which he has treated Hughes. Whatever you think of the decision to get rid of him (and I'm in the camp of he deserved the full season at least), you cannot argue that he deserved to be treated better.

You can't argue with the progress the club has made in terms of the marketing of the "City brand", the stadium is much improved, and we've got a squad capable of challenging, but I don't like this "we've got money, so **** anyone who stands in our way" attitude. I would like to see Cook himself kicked out and replaced by someone who commands a little respect.

 

[bluemanc]

It is one of hypocrisy.

He simply decided he liked his job more than he liked Mark Hughes.

He was the man who appointed him and as such, his choice was found wanting.

But for anyone to suggest that Cook in particular, is pulling the strings is a little naive.

The Sheik made the decision, not Cook, not Marwood.

Khaldoon is his man and trusts him implicity, but even he has to pay the piper, ultimately.

I just can't believe that our generous owner is so unbelievably rich, he gives us little thought.

He is THE man.

So the owner appointed kidd did he ??methinks you may think you know but you are fed titbits some bullshit some accurate.
Sorry but this is just a rumour & should be treated as such.
Don't take it personally because a guy did stuff like this on mancityfans.net & it's pinch of salt stuff.

 

[Bill]

if guilt is the word start looking at marwood.

 

[Maineblue]

finally the owners put there own manager in ...now clear cook and start again ..cook is a slimeball

Maybe going a touch too far but too inexperienced in football and too prone to foot in mouth disease, but I'd be suprised if he's not too far behind Hughes or sidelined into a less demanding role.

 

[Ricster]

It is one of hypocrisy.

He simply decided he liked his job more than he liked Mark Hughes.

He was the man who appointed him and as such, his choice was found wanting.

But for anyone to suggest that Cook in particular, is pulling the strings is a little naive.

The Sheik made the decision, not Cook, not Marwood.

Khaldoon is his man and trusts him implicity, but even he has to pay the piper, ultimately.

I just can't believe that our generous owner is so unbelievably rich, he gives us little thought.

He is THE man.

Nothing up with that. As i have said in another thread, if Hughes had done the same to Bowen then maybe he would still be here.

 

[Craig]

No chance Cook is pulling the strings that gobshite couldn't pull himself off.