If we sack Hughes there would be no divide in our fans.

[Anonymous]

Since the days of Swales fans have called for the heads of managers and usually got their wish, and there in lies the biggest problem at City!

Kendall resigned to go back to Everton.
Reid was sacked by the board and was going downhill.
Horton was sacked by the board, not the fans.
Coppel resigned.
Clarke, Ball and Pearce were deservedly sacked.
Royle was sacked by the board to bring Keegan in.
Keegan resigned.
Sven was sacked when loved by the fans.

The fans have got their wish three times and deservedly so.

 

[mcfcste]

Anybody would unite the fans.

No your wrong, If the club decided to sack Hughes tomorrow there will be a lot of fans angry that he wasn't given the time to get the chairmans target for the season and that the owners have shown that they are no better than previous chairmen (Swales for Reid and Lee for sacking Horton) and that could well lead to yet more in fighting on here more arguements amongst fans at the ground. Yes we are split now don't for one second think a change will make it any better. Success would calm the anger as it will if Hughes gets us into Europe and/or wins a trophy.

If we get the right guy i cant see anyone saying "I wish we had Hughes"

 

[leewill31]

the owners would be fooking mental to sack hughes now,like i and many have said he has till the end of the season barring a major fook up of a loosing run and us fans have to make do with that for now whether some like it or not.

we still have some way to go yet this season and will support the manager and the team up until then if the owners decide before them fair do's but i really hope we as manchester city fans dont let this get to us on match days because in the long run it will do no good at all.