JimmyGrimble10
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 689
Can’t help but feel this is a backwards move given his age and definitely beyond his peak.
Cancelo isn’t £40m.Ye to us. City would be absolutely mental to give a 40m+ player away for a 34 year old that ran his contract down on us.
Cancelo isn’t £40m.
What he is, is a pain in the arse who we don’t need.
As for ‘ran his contract down on us’ so what? That’s his right.
Ye to us. City would be absolutely mental to give a 40m+ player away for a 34 year old that ran his contract down on us.
Cancelo £40 mill? Wouldn't pay £40 quid for him.Ye to us. City would be absolutely mental to give a 40m+ player away for a 34 year old that ran his contract down on us.
I don’t think you understand how it works? They didnt get him off us. He was a free agent. Nothing to do with us.As big a **** as Cancelo is we would be allowing Barca to take the piss big time. AGAIN.
They got Gundogan off us for nothing. If this happened we’d be giving a £20,000,000/ £25,000,000 for our 34 year old player.