Illegal PL streaming - 11 years in prison for "gang" leader.

No idea. But it's obviously a minority of people that watch all that stuff.

Maybe people want to watch one match a weekend and a highlights show and do other stuff with their free time not spend all day watching sport.
Now TV sport, £20 per month these days will cater to that crowd.
 
Part of the problem with sky is they won’t let you take sky sports as a stand alone package,charge say £15- 20 a month and they’d have subscription figures going through the roof,but as it is people are deserting in their droves and getting IPTV for roughly what £40 -80 a year,drop their prices and people might go back until then forget about it ..
You could try NOW TV at £25/month (sometimes lower) which doesn't require any base packages and can be cancelled any time. Just have to get used to the 90 sec delay and if HD is important that's £6 extra.
 
Now TV sport, £20 per month these days will cater to that crowd.

Perhaps but that's a special offer rate, you have to pay extra for HD it isn't included as standard. And you can’t see champions league games without spending more.

Makes sense to not pay through the nose unless you actually are satisfied with the product that Sky offer. You obviously are but others can vote with their feet.

Have you never watched a film online for free?
 
I can go to the cinema as many times I want for £14.99 a month as long as it isn't in a recliner or 3D screening there isn't an additional cost.
Look out for the annual subs having the odd sale for £110 then it works out at under a tenner a month. Also you don't need to pay extra for premium screens if you book for something that isn't just so you can get past the ticket check.
 
My unpopular opinion is that £600 is a very competitive price relative to all other forms of entertainment.

That's a subscription for Prime, BT Sport and Sky/NowTV sports. For that you get 200 PL games (usually 32/38 City games) 15 league cup games, 14 FA Cup all European games (533 across all 3 competitions).

That's not including 1,000 football league games (plus 30 conference games), Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Serie A, Copa del Rey, International matches, Formula 1, Cricket, NFL, Rugby Union (international, premiership and European) and League, Tennis, Darts, Golf and NBA. Plus all the usual Amazon Prime TV shows.


Would I like it to be cheaper? Sure. But for £50 a month I watch as much sport as I could possibly want to. Most of the time there's too much on and I have to choose.

The 3 or 4 times a year City aren't televised, I'll take the dog for a walk and listen on the radio. Over the winter, I probably watch 60-80 hours a month of sport.

Compare that to the price per hour of Netflix, going to a film, the theatre, buying a hardcover book, a night out, a takeaway...it's actually very good value.

You are the "National Sales Director for Sky" and I claim my £5
 
In the US, Premier League games are on regular NBC or their streaming service Peacock - $5.99 a month.
FA Cup / League Cup - ESPN+ $5.99 a month
Champions League is on CBS's streaming service Paramount+ $5.99 a month
Interesting that. But in terms of popularity/demand in the home country wouldn’t American Football be a better comparison - what does that cost per month pal?
 
My unpopular opinion is that £600 is a very competitive price relative to all other forms of entertainment.

That's a subscription for Prime, BT Sport and Sky/NowTV sports. For that you get 200 PL games (usually 32/38 City games) 15 league cup games, 14 FA Cup all European games (533 across all 3 competitions).

That's not including 1,000 football league games (plus 30 conference games), Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Serie A, Copa del Rey, International matches, Formula 1, Cricket, NFL, Rugby Union (international, premiership and European) and League, Tennis, Darts, Golf and NBA. Plus all the usual Amazon Prime TV shows.


Would I like it to be cheaper? Sure. But for £50 a month I watch as much sport as I could possibly want to. Most of the time there's too much on and I have to choose.

The 3 or 4 times a year City aren't televised, I'll take the dog for a walk and listen on the radio. Over the winter, I probably watch 60-80 hours a month of sport.

Compare that to the price per hour of Netflix, going to a film, the theatre, buying a hardcover book, a night out, a takeaway...it's actually very good value.
You need to get a life :)
 
I thought it was because of reduced gates at lower league clubs.
I know plenty who go to Chester, and a few who go to Stockport, and it would make zero difference to them if there was a clash with “another” PL game on the telly.
 
I know plenty who go to Chester, and a few who go to Stockport, and it would make zero difference to them if there was a clash with “another” PL game on the telly.
I'm sure the majority of other clubs supporters wouldn't care less who was on the telly mate.
But when I was a kid, we would sometimes go and watch Oldham if City were playing away.
We wouldn't if City were on the telly. Anyway, that's just the reason I had heard. Not saying it makes sense.
 
I'm sure the majority of other clubs supporters wouldn't care less who was on the telly mate.
But when I was a kid, we would sometimes go and watch Oldham if City were playing away.
We wouldn't if City were on the telly. Anyway, that's just the reason I had heard. Not saying it makes sense.
Yep, bit more common back then, agreed pal.
 
I thought it was because of reduced gates at lower league clubs.
I think that was a reason given.

The thing is, they have 12.30 games on tele when fans would be travelling to these lower league games and one at 17.30 when they’d be travelling home.

So it makes no sense; if they would rather watch the Prem on tele than go to a lower league game, they get to watch two rather than going instead now so surely they’re going to be staying at home to watch both of those?
 
I think that was a reason given.

The thing is, they have 12.30 games on tele when fans would be travelling to these lower league games and one at 17.30 when they’d be travelling home.

So it makes no sense; if they would rather watch the Prem on tele than go to a lower league game, they get to watch two rather than going instead now so surely they’re going to be staying at home to watch both of those?
I think it's an outdated rule mate.
 
Interesting that. But in terms of popularity/demand in the home country wouldn’t American Football be a better comparison - what does that cost per month pal?
Sorry I should have added that CBS and their Paramount stream service also has NFL on it (so included in the $5.99 a month) as well as CBS series and films
ESPN+ also includes 100's of other sports including the Championship.
Peacock doesn't have other sports but does have loads and loads of series / films
 
Sorry I should have added that CBS and their Paramount stream service also has NFL on it (so included in the $5.99 a month) as well as CBS series and films
ESPN+ also includes 100's of other sports including the Championship.
Peacock doesn't have other sports but does have loads and loads of series / films
So to get the max amount of NFL coverage only costs $5.99 a month? Don’t you need a Fox subscription too?
Just trying to compare cost of fullest NFL coverage in the US vs fullest footy coverage over here.
 
So to get the max amount of NFL coverage only costs $5.99 a month? Don’t you need a Fox subscription too?
Just trying to compare cost of fullest NFL coverage in the US vs fullest footy coverage over here.
NFL+ is a service for US customers only, not to be confused with gamepass (allows international purchases). This costs 5 dollars a month or 40 dollars for the season. You can get premium that has stuff like coaching films etc to for 10 dollars a month if you want all the bells and whistles. The basic service covers local games and prime time.

 
Last edited:
NFL+ is a service for US customers only, not to be confused with gamepass (allows international purchases). This costs 5 dollars a month or 40 dollars for the season. You can get premium that has stuff like coaching films etc to for 10 dollars a month if you want all the bells and whistles. The basic service covers local games and prime time.

Cheers for that.

Just doing a quick bit of research, for tv (as opposed to on your phone) coverage of the matches, it looks like NBC, CBS and ABC are all free to air(?), but Fox Sports costs between €74.99 and €40 per month. I don’t know the exchange rate, but it seems to be a similar (if not greater) amount to what sky sports are charging UK customers.
Both aren’t small amounts - and the footy season is twice as long as the nfl of course!
 
I enjoy watching all matches plus boxing. Subscribe to this illegal streaming and you’re responsible for these men being imprisoned.
No your not. That has got to be the daftest comment I've heard in ages.
(I don't go on the match day thread)
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top